The standard approach to the evaluation of funds assumes a normal return distribution and uses the variance as a measure of the funds risk. A few characteristics of hedge funds, such as the remuneration mechanism of the portfolio manager, make this assumption unacceptable and the traditional approach of Risk Adjusted Performance (RAP) must be revised before applying it to hedge funds. Some authors define a number of different RAP measures that attempt to overcome the problem related to the lack of normality: new RAPs are characterized by a more detailed return distribution analysis that does not consider only the first two moments of the distribution. A higher computational complexity may only be reasonable if selections founded on new RAPs permit to identify better investment opportunities than those selected with standard RAPs. This work analyses different approaches proposed with a view to calculating the RAP for hedge funds and evaluates advantages and limits of each proposed measure. An application of these measures to the European hedge funds market is proposed in order to demonstrate the usefulness of new approaches. An empirical analysis studies differences in funds classification based on different measures and demonstrates that the standard RAP approach is unable to identify the best performing hedge funds.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number
4294.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Avner Ben-Ner & Famin Kong & Louis Putterman & Dan Magan, .
"Reciprocity in a Two-Part Dictator Game,"
Working Papers
0902, Industrial Relations Center, University of Minnesota (Twin Cities Campus).
[Downloadable!]
Did you know? You can create a compilation of all publications of a group of people, say alumni of a program, your students or memers of an association.