Confidence intervals in stationary autocorrelated time series
AbstractIn this study we examine in covariance stationary time series the consequences of constructing confidence intervals for the population mean using the classical methodology based on the hypothesis of independence. As criteria we use the actual probability the confidence interval of the classical methodology to include the population mean (actual confidence level), and the ratio of the sampling error of the classical methodology over the corresponding actual one leading to equality between actual and nominal confidence levels. These criteria are computed analytically under different sample sizes, and for different autocorrelation structures. For the AR(1) case, we find significant differentiation in the values taken by the two criteria depending upon the structure and the degree of autocorrelation. In the case of MA(1), and especially for positive autocorrelation, we always find actual confidence levels lower than the corresponding nominal ones, while this differentiation between these two levels is much lower compared to the case of AR(1).
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 31840.
Date of creation: 2002
Date of revision:
Covariance stationary time series; Variance of the sample mean; Actual confidence level;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C10 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - General
- C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General
- C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Park, Dae S. & Kim, Yun B. & Shin, Key I. & Willemain, Thomas R., 2001. "Simulation output analysis using the threshold bootstrap," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 17-28, October.
- Park, Daesu & Willemain, Thomas R., 1999. "The threshold bootstrap and threshold jackknife," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 187-202, August.
- George S. Fishman, 1971. "Estimating Sample Size in Computing Simulation Experiments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 21-38, September.
- R. W. Conway, 1963. "Some Tactical Problems in Digital Simulation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 10(1), pages 47-61, October.
- Averill M. Law & W. David Kelton, 1982. "Confidence Intervals for Steady-State Simulations II: A Survey of Sequential Procedures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 550-562, May.
- Michael A. Crane & Donald L. Iglehart, 1975. "Simulating Stable Stochastic Systems, IV: Approximation Techniques," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(11), pages 1215-1224, July.
- Song, Wheyming Tina, 1996. "On the estimation of optimal batch sizes in the analysis of simulation output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 304-319, January.
- Wheyming Tina Song & Bruce W. Schmeiser, 1995. "Optimal Mean-Squared-Error Batch Sizes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 110-123, January.
- George, Halkos & Ilias, Kevork, 2004.
"H Ασυμπτωτική Διακύμανση Στην Εκτίμηση Του Στάσιμου Μέσου Υπό Συνθήκες Αυτοσυσχέτισης
[Using the asymptotic variance to est," MPRA Paper 33324, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.