Coalition formation in the U.S. Supreme Court: 1969-2009
AbstractWe apply a fallback model of coalition formation to decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, focusing on the seven natural courts, which had the same members for at least two terms, between 1969 and 2009. The predictions of majority coalitions on each of the courts are generally bourn out by the 5-4 decisions, whereas the predictions of the Martin-Quinn (2002) model, which assumes a single underlying dimension along which the justices can be ordered, are not. The present model also provides insight into the dynamic process by which subcoalitions build up into majority coalitions and, in addition, identifies "kingmakers” and “leaders” on the natural courts.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 30390.
Date of creation: Apr 2011
Date of revision:
coalition formation; U.S. Supreme Court; Martin-Quinn scores; single-peakedness;
Other versions of this item:
- Steven Brams & Gustavo Camilo & Alexandra Franz, 2014. "Coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: 1969–2009," Public Choice, Springer, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 525-539, March.
- D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
- C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
- D63 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
- D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances
- D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, and Operations
- C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2011-05-07 (All new papers)
- NEP-CDM-2011-05-07 (Collective Decision-Making)
- NEP-NET-2011-05-07 (Network Economics)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Steven J. Brams & Michael A. Jones & D.Marc Kilgour, 2003.
"Forming Stable Coalitions: The Process Matters,"
Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei
2003.97, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
- Steven Brams & D. Kilgour, 2013.
"Kingmakers and leaders in coalition formation,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer,
Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-18, June.
- Brams, Steven J. & Kilgour, D. Marc, 2010. "Kingmakers and leaders in coalition formation," MPRA Paper 22710, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Marc Kilgour & Steven J. Brams, 2009. "Kingmakers and Leaders in Coalition Formation," Working Papers, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei 2009.41, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
- Kaniovski, Serguei & Leech, Dennis, 2007.
"A Behavioural Power Index,"
The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS), University of Warwick, Department of Economics
831, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.