IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/20705.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cross-Cultural Analysiis of European e-Government Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Aykut, Arslan

Abstract

In terms of adoption, the topic of e-government has focused on the supply side (or government-related issues) such as strategies and policy, challenges, technical issues, evaluation of the usability of e-government Websites; however, less attention has been given to the demand (or citizen’s) perspective. Recent studies of the citizen adoption of e-government services suggest that trust, security, and transparency are the major issues for e-government adoption. The aim of this study was to explore whether cross-national differences in the adoption of e-government (Internet users who visited public authorities’ websites in last three months to obtain information, download, and file forms) are associated with differences among national cultures as described in Hofstede's model of cultural dimensions (Power Distance, Individualism, Masculinity, Uncertainty Avoidance and Long-Term Orientation).

Suggested Citation

  • Aykut, Arslan, 2009. "Cross-Cultural Analysiis of European e-Government Adoption," MPRA Paper 20705, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:20705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/20705/1/MPRA_paper_20705.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lemuria Carter & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2008. "E-government adoption: A cultural comparison," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 473-482, September.
    2. Aykut, Arslan, 2009. "A Strategic Orientation Model for the Turkish Local e-Governments," MPRA Paper 20704, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Valerij Dermol (Ed.) & Anna Rakowska (Ed.), 2014. "Strategic Approaches to Human Resources Management Practice," ToKnowPress Monographs, ToKnowPress, number 978-83-65020-00-0.
    2. Haoyu Zhao & Michael J. Ahn & Aroon P. Manoharan, 2021. "E-Government, Corruption Reduction and the Role of Culture: A Study Based on Panel Data of 57 Countries," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 86-104, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Garín-Muñoz, Teresa & López, Rafael & Pérez-Amaral, Teodosio & Herguera, Iñigo & Valarezo, Angel, 2019. "Models for individual adoption of eCommerce, eBanking and eGovernment in Spain," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 100-111.
    2. Kumju Hwang & Hyemi Um, 2021. "Social Controls and Bonds of Public Information Consumer on Sustainable Utilization and Provision for Computing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Florentina NEAMTU & Bogdan NICHIFOR, 2013. "Impact Factors In Assimilation And Operationalization Of The Concept Of E-Government," Public Administration and Reginal Studies, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Juridical, Social and Political Sciences, issue 2, pages 53-61.
    4. Syed Sardar Muhammad & Bidit Lal Dey & Vishanth Weerakkody, 2018. "Analysis of Factors that Influence Customers’ Willingness to Leave Big Data Digital Footprints on Social Media: A Systematic Review of Literature," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 559-576, June.
    5. Pynnönen, Sari & Haltia, Emmi & Hujala, Teppo, 2021. "Digital forest information platform as service innovation: Finnish Metsaan.fi service use, users and utilisation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Yueping Zheng & Liang Ma, 2022. "How Citizen Demand Affects the Process of M-Government Adoption: An Empirical Study in China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1407-1433, December.
    7. Srinuan, Chalita & Bohlin, Erik, 2011. "Understanding the digital divide: A literature survey and ways forward," 22nd European Regional ITS Conference, Budapest 2011: Innovative ICT Applications - Emerging Regulatory, Economic and Policy Issues 52191, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    8. T. Santhanamery & T. Ramayah, 2015. "Understanding the Effect of Demographic and Personality Traits on the E-Filing Continuance Usage Intention in Malaysia," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, February.
    9. Jana Stofkova & Adela Poliakova & Katarina Repkova Stofkova & Peter Malega & Matej Krejnus & Vladimira Binasova & Naqibullah Daneshjo, 2022. "Digital Skills as a Significant Factor of Human Resources Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Michael J. Magro, 2012. "A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, April.
    11. I. Reay & P. Beatty & S. Dick & J. Miller, 2013. "Privacy policies and national culture on the internet," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 279-292, April.
    12. Valerij Dermol (Ed.) & Anna Rakowska (Ed.), 2014. "Strategic Approaches to Human Resources Management Practice," ToKnowPress Monographs, ToKnowPress, number 978-83-65020-00-0.
    13. Jain, Nikunj Kumar & Kaushik, Kapil & Choudhary, Piyush, 2021. "Sustainable perspectives on transportation: Public perception towards odd-even restrictive driving policy in Delhi, India," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 99-108.
    14. Vishanth Weerakkody & Zahir Irani & Kawal Kapoor & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Yogesh K. Dwivedi, 0. "Open data and its usability: an empirical view from the Citizen’s perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-16.
    15. Tofail Alam & Muhammad Aftab & Zaheer Abbas & Kamoliddin Mannonov Murodjon Ugli & Syed Asad Abbas Bokhari, 2023. "Impact of E-Government Initiatives to Combat Corruption Mediating by Behavioral Intention: A Quantitative Analysis from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Ghassan Beydoun & Babak Abedin & José M. Merigó & Melanie Vera, 2019. "Twenty Years of Information Systems Frontiers," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 485-494, April.
    17. Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida & Deborah Moraes Zouain, 2016. "E-government Impact on Business and Entrepreneurship in High-, Upper-middle- and Lower-income Countries from 2008 to 2014: A Linear Mixed Model Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 17(4), pages 743-758, August.
    18. Kiran Rupakhetee & Almas Heshmati, 2011. "Rhetorics vs. Realities in Implementation of e-Government Master Plan in Nepal," TEMEP Discussion Papers 201175, Seoul National University; Technology Management, Economics, and Policy Program (TEMEP), revised May 2011.
    19. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Michael D. Williams, 2015. "A meta-analysis of existing research on citizen adoption of e-government," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 547-563, June.
    20. Weerakkody, Vishanth & El-Haddadeh, Ramzi & Sabol, Tomas & Ghoneim, Ahmad & Dzupka, Peter, 2012. "E-government implementation strategies in developed and transition economies: A comparative study," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 66-74.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e-government; e-government adoption; European e-government; European Culture; Cross-cultural difference;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H1 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H11 - Public Economics - - Structure and Scope of Government - - - Structure and Scope of Government
    • H7 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations
    • R5 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:20705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.