IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/18941.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Matei, Lucica
  • Iancu, Diana Camelia

Abstract

‘To be or not to be good governance' has probably been a question of interest to scholars for many centuries now; the issue of how to measure it as to offer alternatives for governmental actions however became of interest only recently. In this respect, this paper explores the concept of 'good enough' governance in the context provided by Robert Dahl's theory on democratization. In doing so, it elaborates the idea according to which good enough governance may be interpreted as a minimal democratic system in need of a minimal democratic administrative practice. The validation of this theoretical tool is to be completed against the Romanian administrative reform as assessed by the national strategic documents and the European Commission Regular and Monitoring Reports of 1998-2006. The larger scope of the paper is to offer a comprehensive image of the 'good enough' governance inside the spectrum of the building of a consolidated democracy

Suggested Citation

  • Matei, Lucica & Iancu, Diana Camelia, 2009. "On the Way to Modernization: The 'Good Enough' Governance Making in Romania," MPRA Paper 18941, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 May 2009.
    • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:18941
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/18941/1/MPRA_paper_18941.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucica Matei, 2006. "Public Sector and Europeanization Challenges," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 2(2(497)), pages 27-34, April.
    2. Oecd, 1998. "Preparing Public Administrations for the European Administrative Space," SIGMA Papers 23, OECD Publishing.
    3. March, James G. & Olson, Johan P., 1983. "Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 77(2), pages 281-296, June.
    4. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei, 2008. "Globalization and Europeanization. A Projection on a European Model of Public Administration," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 4(4(521)), pages 33-52, April.
    5. Vachudova, Milada Anna, 2005. "Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199241194.
    6. Oecd, 1999. "European Principles for Public Administration," SIGMA Papers 27, OECD Publishing.
    7. Lucica Matei & Diana-Camelia Iancu, 2007. "Theoretical Delimitations: The Europeanization Of Public Administration And Its Institutional Levers," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER, vol. 6(6(511)(su), pages 93-110, June.
    8. Robin Hambleton, 2000. "Modernising Political Management in Local Government," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 931-950, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristea, Ana Ionela, 2014. "El Espacio Administrativo Europeo en el contexto de la europeización [The European Administrative Space in the context of europeanization]," MPRA Paper 56309, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Andrei, Tudorel & Profiroiu, Marius & Oancea, Bogdan & TurtureaN, Marius & Matei, Ani, 2010. "Analiza unor aspecte legate de mobilitatea si politizarea functiei publice in administratia publica din Romania," MPRA Paper 25957, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 19 Sep 2010.
    3. Kovač Polonca, 2016. "Openness and Transparency in (Slovene) Administrative Procedures as Fundamental European Principles," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 49-67, December.
    4. Ani Matei & Lucica Matei & Diana-Camelia Iancu, 2011. "Socio-Statistical Research on the Internalization of European Administrative Space Principles in the Romanian Public Administration," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Matei, Ani, 2004. "The Development of the European Administration. Fundamental Concepts and Approaches," MPRA Paper 19765, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Dec 2008.
    6. Richard Connolly, 2012. "The Determinants of the Economic Crisis in Post-Socialist Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 35-67.
    7. Loukas Tsoukalis, 2006. "The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Tanja A. Börzel, 2010. "The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded - The Limits of External Europeanization," KFG Working Papers p0011, Free University Berlin.
    9. Catherine Macmillan, 2009. "The Application of Neofunctionalism to the Enlargement Process: The Case of Turkey," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47, pages 789-809, September.
    10. Rose, Richard, 2007. "Evaluating democratic governance: A bottom up approach to European Union enlargement," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2007-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Staroňová Katarína, 2017. "Civil-Service Reforms and Communist Legacy: The Case of Slovakia," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 177-199, June.
    12. Carmen De-Pablos-Heredero & Gonzalo Fernández-Valero & Miguel Blanco-Callejo, 2017. "Supplier Qualification Sub-Process from a Sustained Perspective: Generation of Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-15, May.
    13. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "When Europeanization Hits Limited Statehood. The Western Balkans as a Test Case for the Transformative Power of Europe," KFG Working Papers p0030, Free University Berlin.
    14. Frank Schimmelfennig & Hanno Scholtz, 2010. "Legacies and Leverage: EU Political Conditionality and Democracy Promotion in Historical Perspective," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 443-460.
    15. Gülnur Aybet & Florian Bieber, 2011. "From Dayton to Brussels: The Impact of EU and NATO Conditionality on State Building in Bosnia & Hercegovina," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(10), pages 1911-1937.
    16. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    17. Jarle Trondal & Stefan Gänzle & Benjamin Leruth, 2022. "Differentiation in the European Union in Post‐Brexit and ‐Pandemic Times: Macro‐Level Developments with Meso‐Level Consequences," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(S1), pages 26-37, September.
    18. Tom Christensen & Liang Ma, 2020. "Coordination Structures and Mechanisms for Crisis Management in China: Challenges of Complexity," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, March.
    19. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Jolyon Howorth, 2017. "‘Stability on the Borders’: The Ukraine Crisis and the EU's Constrained Policy Towards the Eastern Neighbourhood," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 121-136, January.
    20. Antoaneta Dimitrova, 2007. "Institutionalization of Imported Rules in the European Union's New Member States: Bringing Politics Back in the Research Agenda," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 37, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    good enough governance; policy making; European integration;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:18941. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.