This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Repulsive Particle Swarm Method on Some Difficult Test Problems of Global Optimization

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mishra, SK

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

In this paper we test a particular variant of the (Repulsive) Particle Swarm method on some rather difficult global optimization problems. A number of these problems are collected from the extant literature and a few of them are newly introduced. First, we introduce the Particle Swarm method of global optimization and its variant called the 'Repulsive Particle Swarm' (RPS) method. Then we endow the particles with some stronger local search abilities - much like tunneling - so that each particle can make a search in its neighborhood to optimize itself. Next, we introduce the test problems, the existing as well as the new ones. We also give plots of some of these functions to help appreciation of the optimization problem. Finally, we present the results of the RPS optimization exercise and compare the results with those obtained by using the Genetic algorithm (GA)and/or Simulated annealing (SA) method. We append the (Fortran) computer program that we have developed and used in this exercise. Our findings indicate that neither the RPS nor the GA/SA method can assuredly find the optimum of an arbitrary function. In case of the Needle-eye and the Corana functions both methods perform equally well while in case of Bukin's 6th function both yield the values of decision variables far away from the right ones. In case of zero-sum function, GA performs better than the RPS. In case of the Perm #2 function, both of the methods fail when the dimension grows larger. In several cases, GA falters or fails while RPS succeeds. In case of N#1 through N#5 and the ANNs XOR functions the RPS performs better than the Genetic algorithm. It is needed that we find out some criteria to classify the problems that suit (or does not suit) a particular method. This classification will highlight the comparative advantages of using a particular method for dealing with a particular class of problems.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/1742/
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by University Library of Munich, Germany in its series MPRA Paper with number 1742.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 05 Oct 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:1742

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Schackstr. 4, D-80539 Munich, Germany
Phone: +49-(0)89-2180-2219
Fax: +49-(0)89-2180-3900
Web page: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Ekkehart Schlicht).

Related research
Keywords: Repulsive Particle Swarm Global optimization non-convex functions Bounded rationality local optima Bukin Corana Rcos Freudenstein Roth Goldenstein Price ANNs XOR Perm Power sum Zero sum Needle-eye Genetic algorithms variants Fortran computer program benchmark test

Find related papers by JEL classification:
C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming - - - Computational Techniques
C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
C65 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming - - - Miscellaneous Mathematical Tools
C69 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming - - - Other
C6 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods and Programming

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2008-11-17.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.