IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/15907.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Betweenness Centrality of Fractal and Non-Fractal Scale-Free Model Networks and Tests on Real Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Kitsak, Maksim
  • Havlin, Shlomo
  • Paul, Gerald
  • Riccaboni, Massimo
  • Pammolli, Fabio
  • Stanley, H. Eugene

Abstract

We study the betweenness centrality of fractal and non-fractal scale-free network models as well as real networks. We show that the correlation between degree and betweenness centrality C of nodes is much weaker in fractal network models compared to non-fractal models. We also show that nodes of both fractal and non-fractal scale-free networks have power law betweenness centrality distribution P(C) ~ C^δ. We find that for non-fractal scale-free networks δ = -2, and for fractal scale-free networks δ = -2 + 1/dB, where dB is the dimension of the fractal network. We support these results by explicit calculations on four real networks: pharmaceutical firms (N = 6776), yeast (N = 1458), WWW (N = 2526), and a sample of Internet network at AS level (N = 20566), where N is the number of nodes in the largest connected component of a network. We also study the crossover phenomenon from fractal to non-fractal networks upon adding random edges to a fractal network. We show that the crossover length ℓ*, separating fractal and non-fractal regimes, scales with dimension dB of the network as p−1/dB, where p is the density of random edges added to the network. We find that the correlation between degree and betweenness centrality increases with p.

Suggested Citation

  • Kitsak, Maksim & Havlin, Shlomo & Paul, Gerald & Riccaboni, Massimo & Pammolli, Fabio & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2007. "Betweenness Centrality of Fractal and Non-Fractal Scale-Free Model Networks and Tests on Real Networks," MPRA Paper 15907, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:15907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15907/1/MPRA_paper_15907.pdf
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orsenigo, L. & Pammolli, F. & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2001. "Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 485-508, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Lina & Huang, Ning & Li, Ruiying & Bai, Yanan, 2019. "A new fractal reliability model for networks with node fractal growth and no-loop," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 514(C), pages 699-707.
    2. Huiling Zhang & Yilin Shen & My T. Thai, 2016. "Robustness of power-law networks: its assessment and optimization," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 696-720, October.
    3. Huang, Da-Wen & Yu, Zu-Guo & Anh, Vo, 2017. "Multifractal analysis and topological properties of a new family of weighted Koch networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 469(C), pages 695-705.
    4. Mahyar, Hamidreza & Hasheminezhad, Rouzbeh & Ghalebi K., Elahe & Nazemian, Ali & Grosu, Radu & Movaghar, Ali & Rabiee, Hamid R., 2018. "Compressive sensing of high betweenness centrality nodes in networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 497(C), pages 166-184.
    5. Georgi Yordanov Georgiev & Atanu Chatterjee & Germano Iannacchione, 2017. "Exponential Self-Organization and Moore’s Law: Measures and Mechanisms," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-9, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lionel Nesta & Vincent Mangematin, 2002. "Industry Life Cycle, Knowledge Generation and Technological Networks," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) hal-03398092, HAL.
    2. Luca Verginer & Federica Parisi & Jeroen van Lidth de Jeude & Massimo Riccaboni, 2022. "The Impact of Acquisitions in the Biotechnology Sector on R&D Productivity," Papers 2203.12968, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2024.
    3. Rene Belderbos & Victor Gilsing & Shinya Suzuki, 2015. "Direct and mediated ties to universities: ‘Scientific’ absorptive capacity and innovation performance of pharmaceutical firms," Working Papers of Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven 504836, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Department of Management, Strategy and Innovation, Leuven.
    4. Pammolli, Fabio & Riccaboni, Massimo, 2004. "Market Structure and Drug Innovation," MPRA Paper 16212, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Michael D König & Stefano Battiston & Mauro Napoletano & Frank Schweitzer, 2008. "The Efficiency and Evolution of R&D Networks," Working Papers hal-00973077, HAL.
    6. Fabius Abrahão Torreão Esteves & Claude Pirmez & Manuela da Silva & Carla Torreão Esteves & Andréa Torreão Esteves & Roberto Pierre Chagnon & Elton Fernandes, 2016. "Social Network Analysis as an Analytical Archetype of R&D National Networks: Case Study in Culture Collections of Brazil and Japan," Review of Social Sciences, LAR Center Press, vol. 1(5), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Stefano Brusoni & Lorenzo Cassi & Simge Tuna, 2021. "Knowledge integration between technical change and strategy making," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(5), pages 1521-1552, November.
    8. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro, 2011. "The dynamics of technological knowledge," Post-Print halshs-00727633, HAL.
    9. Margarida Fontes, 2005. "Distant networking: The knowledge acquisition strategies of 'out-cluster' biotechnology firms," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(6), pages 899-920, September.
    10. Philip Cooke, 2004. "Life Sciences Clusters and Regional Science Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 1113-1131, May.
    11. Milanov, Hana & Fernhaber, Stephanie A., 2009. "The impact of early imprinting on the evolution of new venture networks," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 46-61, January.
    12. Olie, R.L. & Glunk, U. & Heijltjes, M.G., 2003. "Continuity and renewal at the top: performance effects of the level, extent, type and frequency of top management team changes," Research Memorandum 049, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
    13. Maureen McKelvey & Bastian Rake, 2012. "Research Network Position and Innovative Performance: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-021, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    14. Zhang, Jing & Baden-Fuller, Charles & Mangematin, Vincent, 2007. "Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 515-528, May.
    15. Hyunju Rachel Kim, 2014. "Formulation of a Success Model in Pharmaceutical R&D," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, March.
    16. Jing-Yuan Chio & Laura Magazzini & Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2012. "The Value of Failures in Pharmaceutical R&D," Working Papers 1/2012, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Jan 2012.
    17. Bruce Rasmussen, 2010. "Innovation and Commercialisation in the Biopharmaceutical Industry," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13680.
    18. Cowan, Robin, 2004. "Network models of innovation and knowledge diffusion," Research Memorandum 016, Maastricht University, Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    19. Martin Backfisch, 2018. "The Development of Firm Size and Innovativeness in the Pharmaceutical industry between 1989 and 2010," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201813, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    20. Joel A. C. Baum & Robin Cowan & Nicolas Jonard, 2010. "Network-Independent Partner Selection and the Evolution of Innovation Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(11), pages 2094-2110, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Interfirm networks; R&D collaborations; Pharmaceutical industry; ICT.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L65 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Chemicals; Rubber; Drugs; Biotechnology; Plastics
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • E17 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • L00 - Industrial Organization - - General - - - General
    • L63 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Microelectronics; Computers; Communications Equipment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pra:mprapa:15907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joachim Winter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vfmunde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.