IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/por/fepwps/213.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does Order Negotiation Improve The Job-Shop Workload Control?

Author

Listed:
  • M. Rosário Moreira

    (Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto)

  • Rui Alves

    (Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto)

Abstract

Work flows in a job-shop are determined not only by the release load and the time between release factors, but also by the number of accepted orders. There has been extensive research on workload and input-output control aiming at improving the performance of manufacturing operations in job-shops. This paper explores the idea of controlling the workload since the acceptance/rejection of orders stage. A new acceptance/rejection rule is proposed, and tests are conducted to study the sensitivity of job-shop performance to different order acceptance parameters, like the tolerance of the workload limit and the due date extension acceptance. It also evaluates the effect of the negotiation phase of the proposed acceptance rule on the job-shop performance using a simulation model of a generic random job-shop. The extensive simulation experiments allow us to conclude that having a negotiation phase prior to rejection improves almost all workload performance measures. We also conclude that different tolerances of the workload limit affect slightly the performance of the job-shop.

Suggested Citation

  • M. Rosário Moreira & Rui Alves, 2006. "Does Order Negotiation Improve The Job-Shop Workload Control?," FEP Working Papers 213, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    • Handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:213
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fep.up.pt/investigacao/workingpapers/06.06.01_WP213_moreiraalves.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. L. Albin, 1982. "On Poisson Approximations for Superposition Arrival Processes in Queues," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 126-137, February.
    2. Enns, S. T., 2000. "Evaluating shop floor input control using rapid modeling," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 229-241, January.
    3. Calosso, T. & Cantamessa, M. & Vu, Dang & Villa, A., 2003. "Production planning and order acceptance in business to business electronic commerce," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(2), pages 233-249, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Davide Mezzogori & Giovanni Romagnoli & Francesco Zammori, 2021. "Defining accurate delivery dates in make to order job-shops managed by workload control," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 956-991, December.
    2. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hill, R.M. & Seifbarghy, M. & Smith, D.K., 2007. "A two-echelon inventory model with lost sales," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(2), pages 753-766, September.
    2. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    3. S. Rajagopalan, 2002. "Make to Order or Make to Stock: Model and Application," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 241-256, February.
    4. Morabito, Reinaldo & de Souza, Mauricio C. & Vazquez, Mariana, 2014. "Approximate decomposition methods for the analysis of multicommodity flow routing in generalized queuing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 618-629.
    5. Thangam, A. & Uthayakumar, R., 2008. "A two-level supply chain with partial backordering and approximated Poisson demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 228-242, May.
    6. Stevenson, Mark & Hendry, Linda C., 2006. "Aggregate load-oriented workload control: A review and a re-classification of a key approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 676-693, December.
    7. Hau L. Lee & Kamran Moinzadeh, 1987. "Operating characteristics of a two‐echelon inventory system for repairable and consumable items under batch ordering and shipment policy," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 365-380, June.
    8. Hausen, Tobias & Fritz, Melanie & Schiefer, Gerhard, 2006. "Potential of electronic trading in complex supply chains: An experimental study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 580-597, December.
    9. Sarang Deo & Milind Sohoni, 2015. "Optimal Decentralization of Early Infant Diagnosis of HIV in Resource-Limited Settings," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(2), pages 191-207, May.
    10. Olsson, Ralph J. & Hill, Roger M., 2007. "A two-echelon base-stock inventory model with Poisson demand and the sequential processing of orders at the upper echelon," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 310-324, February.
    11. Ebadian, M. & Rabbani, M. & Jolai, F. & Torabi, S.A. & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., 2008. "A new decision-making structure for the order entry stage in make-to-order environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 351-367, February.
    12. Bitran, Gabriel R. & Morabito, Reinaldo., 1994. "Open queueing networks : optimization and performance evaluation models for discrete manufacturing systems," Working papers 3743-94., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    13. Merzifonluoglu, Yasemin & Geunes, Joseph, 2006. "Uncapacitated production and location planning models with demand fulfillment flexibility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 199-216, August.
    14. Alarcón, F. & Alemany, M.M.E. & Ortiz, A., 2009. "Conceptual framework for the characterization of the order promising process in a collaborative selling network context," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 100-114, July.
    15. Ananth. V. Iyer, 2002. "Inventory cost impact of order processing priorities based on demand uncertainty," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 49(4), pages 376-390, June.
    16. Rabta, Boualem, 2013. "A hybrid method for performance analysis of G/G/m queueing networks," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 38-49.
    17. Van Nyen, Pieter L. M. & Van Ooijen, Henny P. G. & Bertrand, J.W.M.J. Will M., 2004. "Simulation results on the performance of Albin and Whitt's estimation method for waiting times in integrated production-inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(2), pages 237-249, July.
    18. Ward Whitt, 2004. "A Diffusion Approximation for the G/GI/n/m Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(6), pages 922-941, December.
    19. Tielemans, Peter F. J. & Kuik, Roelof, 1996. "An exploration of models that minimize leadtime through batching of arrived orders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 374-389, December.
    20. Lin, Hung-Tso & Chang, Wen-Ling, 2008. "Order selection and pricing methods using flexible quantity and fuzzy approach for buyer evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(2), pages 415-428, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    job shop; order negotiation; workload control;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:por:fepwps:213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fepuppt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.