This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Stock Market Liberalisations in the South Asian Region

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Fazal Husain (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)
Abdul Qayyum (Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad)

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

This study attempts to conduct an investigation of the characteristics of the South Asian stock markets including the effects of the opening of these markets. These markets were liberalised in early 1990s as a part of the economic reforms started in the South Asian region about two decades ago. The analysis is conducted for four countries in the South Asia, Bangladesh, India, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, covering the period from 1980 to 2003. The analysis is done with the help of tables, regression analysis, Event Window analysis, and Error Correction Functions. The analysis indicates significant development in stock markets indicators such as market capitalisation and trading value in the region following liberalisation measures. However, the development in stock markets in South Asia does not seem to influence the real sector and the stock markets are still playing a minor role in their respective economies. The integration analysis suggests that the markets in South Asia are integrated with major markets, that is, of USA, UK, and Japan. There is clear evidence that the markets in India and Pakistan are affected by the major as well as the regional markets in the long run. In the short run, however, the markets appear to be independent of one another

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.pide.org.pk/pdf/Working%20Paper/PIDE%20QWorking%20Papers%202006-6.pdf
File Format: application/pdf
File Function: First Version, 2006
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Pakistan Institute of Development Economics in its series PIDE-Working Papers with number 2006:6.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Length: 19 pages.
Date of creation: 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:pid:wpaper:2006:6

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Quaid-i-Azam University Campus, P.O.Box 1091, Islamabad-44000
Phone: (92)(51)9206610
Fax: (92)(51)9210886
Email:
Web page: http://www.pide.org.pk
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Irfan Shakeel).

Related research
Keywords: Stock Markets South Asia Liberalisation Pakistan India Sri Lanka Bangladesh Market Integration

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
  1. Peter Blair Henry, 2000. "Stock Market Liberalization, Economic Reform, and Emerging Market Equity Prices," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 529-564, 04. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Full references

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All RePEc services are meant to be be free forever, as they are all run by volunteers.

This page was last updated on 2008-7-21.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.