Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Fusioni ed acquisizioni: determinanti ed effetti in un confronto europeo

Contents:

Author Info

  • Marco Bellucci
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Il lavoro analizza il processo di riallocazione della proprietà nei settori manifatturieri di 16 paesi europei nel biennio 2006-2007, concentrandosi sullo studio dei fattori istituzionali, settoriali e tecnologici alla base di fusioni ed acquisizioni. In particolare si esaminano le determinanti e gli effetti di tali operazioni in termini di performance per le imprese acquirenti. Dai risultati ottenuti emerge che le operazioni di fusione ed acquisizione risultano più frequenti nei paesi in cui la proprietà azionaria è frammentata e il mercato per il controllo societario, come previsto dall’ampia letteratura sulla corporate governance, agisce da meccanismo correttivo nei casi di inefficiente gestione delle imprese. Dal punto di vista settoriale, la frequenza dei takeover è maggiore nelle industrie meno tradizionali, quali la chimica e l’elettronica, e più in generale nei settori in cui il ruolo chiave ai fini dell’innovazione è giocato dall’attività interna di R&S. Inoltre emerge che la maggior parte delle società acquirenti europee è di grande dimensione in termini di fatturato, e sono proprio le imprese più grandi ad intraprendere con maggior frequenza operazioni di M&A. A parità di condizioni, un paese con una base industriale ampia e frammentata in tante piccole e medie unità aziendali risulta quindi meno attivo di altri nel mercato delle acquisizioni societarie. Le imprese acquirenti europee presentano prima dell’acquisizione profili reddituali e finanziari migliori e risultano più dotate di intangible assets delle imprese del campione di controllo; l’acquisizione, inoltre, non sembra avere, in generale, nel breve periodo, effetti positivi sulle performance delle imprese acquirenti. Tuttavia, l’acquisizione appare produrre effetti positivi sul versante della produttività e degli intangible assets, segnalando che uno degli obiettivi delle imprese nell’intraprendere un’acquisizione è quello di sfruttare complementarietà o sinergie nelle attività “invisibili”.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.ec.unipg.it/DEFS/uploads/qd_80web.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Università di Perugia, Dipartimento Economia, Finanza e Statistica in its series Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica with number 80/2010.

    as in new window
    Length: 44 pages
    Date of creation: 01 Nov 2010
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:pia:wpaper:80/2010

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: via Pascoli, 20 - 06123 Perugia
    Phone: +39 075 5855279
    Fax: +39 075 5855299
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.ec.unipg.it/DEFS/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Mergers and Acquisitions; Innovation; Technological regimes; Corporate governance;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 1997. "Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative Activities," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(1), pages 83-117.
    2. Roll, Richard, 1986. "The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 59(2), pages 197-216, April.
    3. Henry G. Manne, 1965. "Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73, pages 351.
    4. Henry G. Manne, 1965. "Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 73, pages 110.
    5. Gort, Michael & Klepper, Steven, 1982. "Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 92(367), pages 630-53, September.
    6. Rossi, Stefano & Volpin, Paolo, 2003. "Cross-Country Determinants of Mergers and Acquisitions," CEPR Discussion Papers 3889, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. Geroski, Paul A & Gugler, Klaus Peter, 2001. "Corporate Growth Convergence in Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 2838, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. La Porta, Rafael & Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 2000. "Investor protection and corporate governance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 3-27.
    9. Fabrizio Cesaroni & Alfonso Gambardella & Walter Garcia-Fontes & Myriam Mariani, 2001. "The Chemical Sector al System. Firms, markets, institutions and the processes of knowledge creation and diffusion," LEM Papers Series 2001/17, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    10. repec:ant:wpaper:1999018 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Benfratello Luigi, 2001. "Determinanti ed effetti delle fusioni e acquisizioni: un'analisi sulla base delle notifiche alle autorità antitrust," L'industria, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 469-500.
    12. Goergen, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2002. "Shareholder Wealth Effects of European Domestic and Cross-Border Takeover Bids," Discussion Paper 2002-50, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    13. Breschi, Stefano & Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 2000. "Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 110(463), pages 388-410, April.
    14. Martynova, M. & Renneboog, L.D.R., 2006. "Mergers and Acquisitions in Europe," Discussion Paper 2006-003, Tilburg University, Tilburg Law and Economic Center.
    15. Yakov Amihud & Baruch Lev, 1981. "Risk Reduction as a Managerial Motive for Conglomerate Mergers," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 12(2), pages 605-617, Autumn.
    16. Cohen, Wesley M. & Levin, Richard C., 1989. "Empirical studies of innovation and market structure," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 18, pages 1059-1107 Elsevier.
    17. Dennis Mueller, 1996. "Antimerger policy in the United States: History and lessons," Empirica, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 229-253, October.
    18. Malerba, Franco & Orsenigo, Luigi, 1996. "Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 451-478, May.
    19. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-29, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pia:wpaper:80/2010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ubaldo Pizzoli).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.