IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/197905.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On How to Measure Poverty

Author

Listed:
  • Mahar K. Mangahas

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

Abstract

The meaningfulness of a poverty measure depends on both the social acceptability of the poverty line and the accuracy of the measured distribution of purchasing power to which the line is applied. In particular, the use of linear programming to construct a minimum food budget and the uncritical use of the 1975 Family Income and Expenditures Survey of the National Census and Statistics Office has led Tan and Holazo(1978) to some very questionable conclusions. As early as 1975, the Social Indicators Project, making the first effort to construct poverty thresholds for application to a national cross-section of purchasing power (namely the FIES series of the NCSO), showed that absolute and relative poverty worsened during 1961-1971. In 1977 the PREPF project found that the 1975 FIES had very serious defects, and rejected using it to update the poverty trend; on the basis of independent PREPF surveys, adjusted for consistency with the National Income Accounts, it felt that about three-fifths of all households in 1975 should be rated as poor (below P10,000 annual income per households, somewhat more generous than the average SIP Total Thresholds), but could not draw any conclusion about the 1971-1975 trend.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahar K. Mangahas, 1979. "On How to Measure Poverty," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 197905, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Estanislao, Jesus P. & Adamag, F.E. & Lim, M.T., 1981. "Sources of Philippine Industrial Growth, 1956-1978," Working Papers WP 1981-07, Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197905. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.