IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/phs/dpaper/197628.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Income Education, Fertility and Employment : Philippines 1973

Author

Listed:
  • Dante B. Canlas

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

  • Jose Encarnacion, Jr.

    (School of Economics, University of the Philippines Diliman)

Abstract

The quantitative model presented in this paper employs 5 estimated equations involving fertility, female employment, age at marriage, husband's income and family income as endogenous variables. The model features a threshold hypothesis apropos fetility and wife's employment: the marginal effects of income and educational level are positive or negative depending on whether or not these variables fall below certain thresholds. Empirical verification was focused on a cross section of households drawn from the 1973 National Demographic Survey. Separate parameter estimates were done for an all, rural urban samples. The findings for all and rural cases showed education of the wife as a key factor in lending a negative effect on fertility beyond certain income and education thresholds and a positive effect on the wife's participation in market activities above an income threshold. The findings highlight from a policy viewpoint the need for pushing the education threshold to zero such that more years of schooling will invariably lead to lower family size and increased market participation of the wife. For the urban case, we are led to conjecture that the negative marginal effect of education on fertility is felt at lower years of schooling than in the rural case.

Suggested Citation

  • Dante B. Canlas & Jose Encarnacion, Jr., 1976. "Income Education, Fertility and Employment : Philippines 1973," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 197628, University of the Philippines School of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197628
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:phs:dpaper:197628. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: RT Campos (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/seupdph.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.