A key question of auction design is whether to use an ascending- bid or a sealed-bid format. The critical distinction between formats is that an ascending auction provides the bidders with information through the process of bidding. This information is a two-edged sword. It may stimulate competition by creating a reliable process of price discovery, by reducing the winner's curse, and by allowing efficient aggregations of items. Alternatively, the information may be used by bidders to establish and enforce collusive outcomes. Ex ante asymmetries and weak competition favor a sealed-bid design. In other cases, an ascending auction is likely to perform better in efficiency and revenue terms. Moreover, information in an ascending auction can be tailored to limit collusion.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton in its series Papers of Peter Cramton with number
98eer.
Length: 12 pages Date of creation: 28 Jul 1998 Date of revision:
28 Jul 1998 Publication status: Published in European Economic Review, 42:3-5, May 1998, pages 745-756. Handle: RePEc:pcc:pccumd:98eer
Contact details of provider: Postal: Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-7211 Phone: (202) 318-0520 Fax: (202) 318-0520 Web page: http://www.cramton.umd.edu
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Peter Cramton).
Find related papers by JEL classification: D44 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure and Pricing - - - Auctions
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Bulow, Jeremy I & Huang, Ming & Klemperer, Paul, 1996.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
CEPR Discussion Papers
1486, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1999.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
Finance
9903005, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Jeremy Bulow & Ming Huang & Paul Klemperer, 1996.
"Toeholds and Takeovers,"
Finance
9608001, EconWPA.
[Downloadable!]
Lawrence M. Ausubel & Peter Cramton, 1997.
"Auctioning Securities,"
Papers of Peter Cramton
98wpas, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised Mar 1998.
[Downloadable!]
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Peter Cramton, 2002.
"Spectrum Auctions,"
Papers of Peter Cramton
01hte, University of Maryland, Department of Economics - Peter Cramton, revised 16 Jul 2001.
[Downloadable!]