Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Medical Liability Litigation: An Historical Look at the Causes for Its Growth in the United Kingdom

Contents:

Author Info

  • David Chacko
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The frequency and severity of medical liability litigation in the United Kingdom have increased since the middle of the twentieth century.� Recent estimates of settling outstanding negligence claims hover around at least 10 percent of the National Health Service's total annual budget.� This paper argues that the frequency and severity of these claims have increased as patients have been increasingly dissatisfied with the established complaints procedures and regulation of physicians and as doctors have seen their influence in the doctor-patient relationship decrease.� The current litigation situation compared to the past is three pronged: doctors are being sued more often; when sued, they are more likely to lose; and when losing, the claims awarded against them are increasing in size.� As patients become increasingly aware that doctors are more likely to lose when sued and that the courts are more likely to award larger settlements, the frequency with which doctors are sued will almost certainly escalate.� This paper concludes by discussing no-fault compensation as an alternative to litigation that would likely reduce physicians' susceptibility to litigation.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/3784/77chacko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number Paper 77.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 01 Apr 2009
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:paper-77

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Manor Rd. Building, Oxford, OX1 3UQ
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Paul David & S. Ryan Johansson and Andrea Pozzi, 2010. "The Demography of an Early Mortality Transition: Life Expectancy, Survival and Mortality Rates for Britain's Royals, 1500-1799," Economics Series Working Papers Number 83, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:paper-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Caroline Wise).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.