Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

The Bank of England and the British Economy, 1890-1913

Contents:

Author Info

  • Nicholas Dimsdale
Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    The paper examines the behavior of the British economy 1890-1913 by using a newly assembled quarterly data set.� This provides a basis for estimating a small macroeconomic model, which can be used to explore the relationship between the policy responses of the Bank of England and the course of the economy.� It is one of the few papers to make use of UK quarterly data and seeks to extend the earlier work of Goodhart (1972).� The paper goes on to look into the determinants of external and internal gold flows and relates these to an extensive historical literature.� The outcome is compared with the traditional representation of the working of the gold standard, as set out in the well-known Interim Report of the Cunliffe Committee (1918).� It is found that operation of the model accords in general with the views of the Committee.� The views of the Committee were applicable to the pre 1914 gold standard, but less so to the restored interwar gold standard. The next question to be considered is how far the Bank observed 'The Rules of the Game' in the sense of relating the reserves of the commercial banks to the gold reserves held at the Bank.� It is shown that the relationship between the Bank's reserves and the reserves of the commercial banks was severely distorted by the massive gold movements of 1895-6.� These flows were associated with US political conflicts over the monetization of silver.� With the exception of this episode, the Bank is shown to have had a limited measure of discretion in operating the gold standard.� The final question to be considered is whether a similar model can be estimated from US data and related to the views of Friedman and Schwartz.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/materials/papers/13111/Dimsdale.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Oxford, Department of Economics in its series Economics Series Working Papers with number Number 123.

    as in new window
    Length:
    Date of creation: 24 Oct 2013
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:number-123

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Manor Rd. Building, Oxford, OX1 3UQ
    Email:
    Web page: http://www.economics.ox.ac.uk/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:number-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Caroline Wise).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.