IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oxf/wpaper/2001-fe-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Resource Margin Accounting: Empirical Results for US Manufacturing Companies 1983-1998

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Johnson

Abstract

In this paper empirical results are presented concerning Resource Margin valuation models previously developed by the author. The research tests the strength of the general linkages between resource margins and valuation measures for a sample of approximately 300 US manufacturing companies between 1983 and 1998. Good explanatory support is found for the use of resource margins. In particular, the resource model developed has greater explanatory power than traditional market-to-book models. In a separate body of analysis, specific time-series valuation models for individual companies are tested, for which the results are poor. For both analyses, supplementary investigations have been carried out into multi-collinearity, and heteroskedasticity for the ordinary least squares models developed. Altogether the results are encouraging, but further work is required to extend the sample of companies, and to develop improved general model specifications to cope with problems of auto-correlation amongst the data for individual companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Johnson, 1999. "Resource Margin Accounting: Empirical Results for US Manufacturing Companies 1983-1998," Economics Series Working Papers 2001-FE-17, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:2001-fe-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oxf:wpaper:2001-fe-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anne Pouliquen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfeixuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.