Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

A Welfare Analysis of Global Patent Protection in a Model with Endogenous Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment

Contents:

Author Info

  • Hitoshi Tanaka

    ()
    (Faculty of Economics, Hokkai Gaku-en University)

  • Tatsuro Iwaisako

    ()
    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University)

  • Koichi Futagami

    ()
    (Graduate School of Economics, Osaka University)

Abstract

This paper constructs a North-South quality ladder model in which foreign direct investment (FDI) is determined by the endogenous location choice of firms and examines analytically how strengthening patent protection in the South affects welfare in the South. Strengthening patent protection increases the Southfs welfare by enhancing innovation and FDI, but also allows the firms with patents to charge higher prices for their goods, which decreases welfare. However, the model shows that the former positive welfare effect overcomes the latter negative one, and introducing the strictest form of patent protection in the South, that is, harmonizing patent protection in the South with that in the North, may maximize welfare in the South as well as in the North.

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) in its series Discussion Papers in Economics and Business with number 09-24.

as in new window
Length: 35 pages
Date of creation: Aug 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:0924

Contact details of provider:
Email:
Web page: http://www.econ.osaka-u.ac.jp/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: foreign direct investment; innovation; intellectual property rights protection; welfare analysis;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Gilbert, R. & Shapiro, C., 1988. "Optimal Patent Length And Breadth," Papers, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper 28, Princeton, Woodrow Wilson School - Discussion Paper.
  2. Lai, Edwin L. -C., 1998. "International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 133-153, February.
  3. Elias Dinopoulos & Constantina Kottaridi, 2008. "The Growth Effects of National Patent Policies," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 499-515, 08.
  4. Debasis Mondal & M. Gupta, 2008. "Innovation, imitation and multinationalisation in a North–South model: a theoretical note," Journal of Economics, Springer, Springer, vol. 94(1), pages 31-62, 06.
  5. Ted O'Donoghue & Josef Zweim¸ller, 2004. "Patents in a Model of Endogenous Growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 81-123, 03.
  6. McCalman, P., 1999. "Reaping What You Sow: An Empirical Analysis of International Patent Harmonization," Papers, Australian National University - Department of Economics 374, Australian National University - Department of Economics.
  7. Futagami, Koichi & Iwaisako, Tatsuro, 2007. "Dynamic analysis of patent policy in an endogenous growth model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 132(1), pages 306-334, January.
  8. Ai-Ting Goh & Jacques Olivier, 2002. "Optimal Patent Protection in a Two-Sector Economy," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 43(4), pages 1191-1214, November.
  9. Judd, Kenneth L, 1985. "On the Performance of Patents," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 567-85, May.
  10. Glass, Amy Jocelyn & Wu, Xiaodong, 2007. "Intellectual property rights and quality improvement," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 393-415, March.
  11. Glass, Amy Jocelyn & Saggi, Kamal, 2002. "Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 56(2), pages 387-410, March.
  12. Grinols, Earl & Lin, Hwan C., 2006. "Global patent protection: channels of north and south welfare gain," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 205-227, February.
  13. Walter G. Park & Douglas Lippoldt, 2005. "International licensing and the strengthening of intellectual property rights in developing countries during the 1990s," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, OECD Publishing, vol. 2005(1), pages 7-48.
  14. Zigic, Kresimir, 1998. "Intellectual property rights violations and spillovers in North-South trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1779-1799, November.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Furukawa, Yuichi, 2013. "A Schumpeterian Analysis of Monetary Policy, Innovation and North-South Technology Transfer," Economics Working Paper Series 1319, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
  2. Hori, Takeo & Yamagami, Hiroaki, 2014. "Intellectual property rights protection in the presence of exhaustible resources," MPRA Paper 58064, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Davis, Colin & Hashimoto, Ken-ichi, 2014. "Patterns of technology, industry concentration, and productivity growth without scale effects," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 266-278.
  4. Tatsuro Iwaisako, 2012. "Welfare effects of patent protection and productive public services: why do developing countries prefer weaker patent protection?," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) 12-19, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP).
  5. Morita, Tadashi, 2012. "Dynamic analysis of location choice by multinational firms," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1063-1076.
  6. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2013. "Theory and Empirics of Stage-Dependent Intellectual Property Rights," Economics Working Paper Series 1306, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
  7. Chu, Angus C. & Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2014. "Stage-dependent intellectual property rights," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 239-249.
  8. Hitoshi Tanaka & Tatsuro Iwaisako, 2013. "Intellectual Property Rights and Foreign Direct Investment: A Welfare Analysis," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) 13-15, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP).
  9. Lin, Hwan C., 2013. "Optimal Patent Life in a Variety-Expansion Growth Model," MPRA Paper 49790, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  10. Suzuki, Keishun, 2014. "Southern Innovation and Foreign Direct Investment," MPRA Paper 57054, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  11. Angus C. Chu & Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2011. "Innovating Like China: a Theory of Stage-Dependent Intellectual Property Rights," Working Papers 2011_14, Durham University Business School.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osk:wpaper:0924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Atsuko SUZUKI).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.