Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Comprehensive selectivity assessment for a major consumer panel: attitudes toward government regulation of environment, health and safety risks

Contents:

Author Info

  • Trudy Ann Cameron

    ()
    (University of Oregon Economics Department)

  • J.R. DeShazo

    ()
    (School of Public Affairs, UCLA)

Abstract

Researchers acknowledge several reasons for possible non-representativeness in surveys conducted on samples drawn from large consumer panels. We model the selection process for one major consumer panel, maintained by Knowledge Networks, Inc., starting with over 525,000 random-digit-dialed panel-recruitment contacts and ending with one specific sample of 2,911 respondents to an actual survey. We match addresses or telephone exchanges to the appropriate census tract and explain sample selection relative to the initial RDD contact pool using a set of fifteen orthogonal factors based on census tract characteristics, plus county voting percentages in the 2000 Presidential election. To assess sample selectivity, we consider answers to a survey question where respondents were asked for their opinions about the proper role of government in environmental, health and safety regulation. We model these attitudes as a function of individual characteristics. Despite evidence of sample selectivity of a plausible nature, the effect of this selectivity is not statistically significant in explaining the attitudes expressed in the survey. Parameter estimates and inferences change only slightly when we control for non-random survey participation.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://economics.uoregon.edu/papers/UO-2010-13_Cameron_DeShazo_Comprehensive_selectivity.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Bill Harbaugh)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by University of Oregon Economics Department in its series University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers with number 2010-13.

as in new window
Length: 32
Date of creation: 16 Nov 2005
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ore:uoecwp:2010-13

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 1285 University of Oregon, 435 PLC, Eugene, OR 97403-1285
Phone: (541) 346-4661
Fax: (541) 346-1243
Email:
Web page: http://economics.uoregon.edu/
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords: sample selection; consumer panel; census tracts; voting percentages; GIS; attitudes toward government regulation;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. V. Kerry Smith & Carol Mansfield & Laurel Clayton, 2008. "Valuing a Homeland Security Policy: Countermeasures for the Threats from Shoulder Mounted Missiles," NBER Working Papers 14325, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ore:uoecwp:2010-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bill Harbaugh).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.