Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Measuring the Pro-Poorness of Income Growth Within an Elasticity Framework

Contents:

Author Info

  • B. Essama-Nssah

    (World Bank Poverty Reduction Group)

  • Peter J. Lambert

    ()
    (University of Oregon Economics Department)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Poverty reduction has become a fundamental objective of development, and therefore a metric for assessing the effectiveness of various interventions. Economic growth can be a powerful instrument of income poverty reduction. This creates a need for meaningful ways of assessing the poverty impact of growth. This paper follows the elasticity approach to propose a measure of pro-poorness defined as a weighted average of the deviation of a growth pattern from the benchmark case. The measure can help assess pro-poorness both in terms of aggregate poverty measures which are members of the additively separable class, and at percentiles. It also lends itself to a decomposition procedure, whereby the overall pattern of income growth can be unbundled, and the contributions of income components to overall pro-poorness identified. An application to data for Indonesia in the 1990s reveals that the amount of poverty reduction achieved over that period remains far below what would have been achieved under distributional neutrality. This conclusion is robust to the choice of a poverty measure among members of the additively separable class, and can be tracked back to changes in expenditure components.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://economics.uoregon.edu/papers/UO-2006-12_Lambert_ProPoor.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by University of Oregon Economics Department in its series University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers with number 2006-12.

    as in new window
    Length: 38
    Date of creation: 10 Sep 2006
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:ore:uoecwp:2006-12

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: 1285 University of Oregon, 435 PLC, Eugene, OR 97403-1285
    Phone: (541) 346-4661
    Fax: (541) 346-1243
    Email:
    Web page: http://economics.uoregon.edu/
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: poverty; growth; pro-poorness; social evaluation JEL classifications :;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ore:uoecwp:2006-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bill Harbaugh).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.