Trade Preference Erosion: Potential Economic Impacts
AbstractThis paper presents the new findings from the on-going work of the OECD project on trade preference erosion. Following a review of the recent literature, the paper develops two main types of analysis. First, a detailed statistical analysis is undertaken drawing on the trade preferences database developed by the Secretariat and covering the Quad countries and Australia. This includes a presentation of the structure of tariff regimes in these key developed countries and identification of countries and sectors that are most reliant on tariff preferences. The second analytical approach uses the standard model and database of the Global Trade Analysis Project to simulate trade liberalisation scenarios that would entail preference erosion. While highlighting a number of cases of preference reliance, the paper underscores the advantages of multilateral liberalisation. Globally and for a majority of developing regions, liberalisation by preference-granting countries will result in positive welfare gains, notwithstanding the effects of preference erosion. In a comparatively small number of cases, however, the analysis points to a risk of net welfare losses under the scenarios modelled here.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by OECD Publishing in its series OECD Trade Policy Papers with number 17.
Date of creation: 26 Apr 2005
Date of revision:
CGE simulation; developing countries; multilateral trade negotiations; tariff reductions; nonreciprocal preferences; preference erosion;
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2005-10-15 (All new papers)
- NEP-CMP-2005-10-15 (Computational Economics)
- NEP-CWA-2005-10-15 (Central & Western Asia)
- NEP-INT-2005-10-15 (International Trade)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Aussilloux, Vincent & Gallezot, Jacques, 2006. "Collected Customs Duties: A Comparative Analysis of the Protection Applied by the US and the EU," Working Papers 18871, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
- Sam LAIRD, 2007. "Aid for Trade: Cool Aid or Kool-Aid?," G-24 Discussion Papers 48, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
- Anania, Giovanni, 2010. "EU Economic Partnership Agreements and WTO negotiations. A quantitative assessment of trade preference granting and erosion in the banana market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 140-153, April.
- Erika Vianna Grossrieder, 2006. "Preference Erosion: The case of Bangladesh - A SUR-EC-AR Gravity Model of Trade," IHEID Working Papers 18-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Aug 2007.
- Lawrence, Robert Z. & Rosito, Tatiana, 2006.
"A New Compensation Mechanism for Preference Erosion in the Doha Round,"
Working Paper Series
rwp06-044, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
- Robert Z. Lawrence & Tatiana Rosito, 2006. "A New Compensation Mechanism for Preference Erosion in the Doha Round," IDB Publications 9196, Inter-American Development Bank.
- Osakwe, Patrick N., 2006. "Emerging Issues and Concerns of African Countries in the WTO Negotiations on Agriculture and the Doha Round," MPRA Paper 1850, University Library of Munich, Germany.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.