IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/stiaaa/2012-4-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Modes of Public Funding of Research and Development: Towards Internationally Comparable Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Jan van Steen

    (Rathenau Instituut)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the data collection across 18 participating countries, demonstrating that it is possible to produce new policy relevant indicators on public funding of R&D in addition to those envisaged in the OECD Frascati Manual. The initial findings of the data collection highlight interesting differences across countries in terms of their approaches to funding R&D. But before conclusions can be drawn on the effectiveness of the different country funding profiles, further work is needed in order to increase the reliability and comparability of the different indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan van Steen, 2012. "Modes of Public Funding of Research and Development: Towards Internationally Comparable Indicators," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2012/4, OECD Publishing.
  • Handle: RePEc:oec:stiaaa:2012/4-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5k98ssns1gzs-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k98ssns1gzs-en
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5k98ssns1gzs-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koen Jonkers & Robert Tijssen & Athina Karvounaraki & Xabier Goenaga Beldarrain, 2018. "A Regional Innovation Impact Assessment Framework for universities," JRC Research Reports JRC109020, Joint Research Centre.
    2. A. A. Kovalenko & A. O. Polushkina & A. V. Fedotov, 2022. "Science at Universities – the Development Driver or Privilege of the Selected Ones," University Management: Practice and Analysis, Federal State Autonomous Educational Institution of Higher Education «Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B.N.Yeltsin»; Non-Commercial Partnership “University Management: Practice and, vol. 25(4).
    3. Sandström, Ulf & Van den Besselaar, Peter, 2018. "Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 365-384.
    4. Maribel Guerrero & David Urbano, 2019. "Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1347-1366, October.
    5. Tanel Hirv, 2022. "The interplay of the size of the research system, ways of collaboration, level, and method of funding in determining bibliometric outputs," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(3), pages 1295-1316, March.
    6. Alexander Cuntz, 2014. "ERAWATCH Country Reports 2012: Austria," JRC Research Reports JRC83823, Joint Research Centre.
    7. Emanuela Reale, 2017. "Analysis of National Public Research Funding (PREF) - Final Report," JRC Research Reports JRC107599, Joint Research Centre.
    8. Cornelis A. Bochove, 2013. "Economic statistics and scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 96(3), pages 799-818, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:stiaaa:2012/4-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/scoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.