IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/govaac/47-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Centralised Purchasing Systems in the European Union

Author

Listed:
  • OECD

Abstract

This study provides a comparative analysis of existing centralised purchasing institutions in selected EU Member States in terms of organisation, coverage, objectives and rationale, financing models, types of framework agreements and call-off systems, as well as the information technology used, and it examines success factors, risks and future challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Oecd, 2011. "Centralised Purchasing Systems in the European Union," SIGMA Papers 47, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:47-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5kgkgqv703xw-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgkgqv703xw-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5kgkgqv703xw-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Weiszer, Michal & Chen, Jun & Locatelli, Giorgio, 2015. "An integrated optimisation approach to airport ground operations to foster sustainability in the aviation sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 567-582.
    2. Brink, Corjan & Vollebergh, Herman R.J. & van der Werf, Edwin, 2016. "Carbon pricing in the EU: Evaluation of different EU ETS reform options," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 603-617.
    3. Krishnendu Ghosh Dastidar, 2014. "Scoring Auctions," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 2(1), pages 35-48, June.
    4. Werner Hölzl & Michael Böheim & Michael Klien & Eva Pichler, 2017. "Das öffentliche Beschaffungswesen im Spannungsfeld zwischen Billigst- und Bestbieterprinzip," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 59256, Juni.
    5. Apajalahti, Eeva-Lotta & Lovio, Raimo & Heiskanen, Eva, 2015. "From demand side management (DSM) to energy efficiency services: A Finnish case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 76-85.
    6. Koning, Pierre & van de Meerendonk, Arthur, 2014. "The impact of scoring weights on price and quality outcomes: An application to the procurement of Welfare-to-Work contracts," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 1-14.
    7. Clark, Robert & Coviello, Decio & de Leverano, Adriano, 2021. "Centralized procurement and delivery times: Evidence from a natural experiment in Italy," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-063, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Dastidar, Krishnendu Ghosh & Mukherjee, Diganta, 2014. "Corruption in delegated public procurement auctions," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 122-127.
    9. Krishnendu Ghosh Dastidar & Fumio Dei, 2014. "Introduction to the Special Issue of Pacific Economic Review on Market Quality Economics," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(5), pages 531-536, December.
    10. Krishnendu Ghosh Dastidar, 2014. "Scoring auctions with non-quasilinear scoring rules," ISER Discussion Paper 0902, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
    11. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:692:p:1-17 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Massimiliano Ferraresi & Gianluca Gucciardi & Leonzio Rizzo, 2017. "Does purchase centralization reduce public expenditure? Evidence from the Italian healthcare system," Working papers 66, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    13. Michal Plaček & Martin Schmidt & František Ochrana & Milan Půček, 2019. "Factors Affecting the Length of Procedure in Public Procurement: The Case of the Czech Republic," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(3), pages 313-329.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:govaac:47-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/teoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.