This study updates and extends a previous study on equity in physician utilisation for a subset of the countries analyzed here (Van Doorslaer, Koolman and Puffer, 2002). It updates results to 2000 for 13 countries and adds new results for eight countries: Australia, Finland, France, Hungary, Mexico, Norway, Switzerland and Sweden. Both simple quintile distributions and concentration indices were used to assess horizontal equity, i.e. the extent to which adults in equal need for physician care appear to have equal rates of medical care utilisation.
With respect to physician utilisation, need is more concentrated among the worse off, but after “standardizing out” these need differences, significant horizontal inequity favoring the better off is found in about half of the countries, both for the probability and the total number of visits. The degree of pro-rich inequity in doctor use is highest in the US, followed by Mexico, Finland, Portugal and Sweden.
In the majority ...
Cette étude actualise et étend le champ d'investigation d'une étude antérieure sur l'équité de l'utilisation des services des médecins effectuée pour un sous-ensemble de pays analysés ici (Van Doorslaer, Koolman et Puffer, 2002). Elle actualise les résultats jusqu’à l’année 2000 pour treize pays et incorpore de nouveaux résultats pour huit autres pays de l'OCDE : l’Australie, la Finlande, la France, la Hongrie, le Mexique, la Norvège, la Suisse et la Suède. Elle utilise à la fois les distributions par quintile et les indices de concentration pour évaluer l'équité horizontale, c’est-à-dire dans quelle mesure des adultes ayant un égal besoin de soins médicaux ont apparemment des taux identiques d'utilisation de soins médicaux.
Pour ce qui est de l'utilisation des médecins, les besoins en services médicaux ont tendance à être plus concentrés parmi les catégories défavorisées, mais après avoir pris en compte ces différences de besoins, on observe une iniquité horizontale positive ...
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by OECD, Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs in its series OECD Health Working Papers with number
14.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().
Related research
Keywords:
Find related papers by JEL classification: I11 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Analysis of Health Care Markets I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health I19 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Other
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Did you know? You can import bibliographic info in various formats into you bibliographic tool, or just into your word processor. See under "publisher info" on each abstract page.