IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/oec/eduaac/2011-10-en.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Well-Being at School: Does Infrastructure Matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Katrien Cuyvers

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Gio De Weerd

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Sanne Dupont

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Sophie Mols

    (University of Antwerp)

  • Chantal Nuytten

    (University of Antwerp)

Abstract

What is the impact of school infrastructure on the well-being of students in Flemish secondary schools? A study, commissioned by AGIOn (the Flemish agency that subsidises school buildings), investigated the impact of educational spaces on their users and set out to identify empirical evidence supporting the importance of school infrastructure on the well-being of students in secondary schools.

Suggested Citation

  • Katrien Cuyvers & Gio De Weerd & Sanne Dupont & Sophie Mols & Chantal Nuytten, 2011. "Well-Being at School: Does Infrastructure Matter?," CELE Exchange, Centre for Effective Learning Environments 2011/10, OECD Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:oec:eduaac:2011/10-en
    DOI: 10.1787/5kg0lkzc81vc-en
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kg0lkzc81vc-en
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1787/5kg0lkzc81vc-en?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bhattacharya, Rudrani & Sen Gupta, Abhijit & Sikdar, Satadru, 2020. "Building Infrastructure to Promote Inclusive Growth," Working Papers 20/321, National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
    2. Sara Manca & Veronica Cerina & Valentina Tobia & Simona Sacchi & Ferdinando Fornara, 2020. "The Effect of School Design on Users’ Responses: A Systematic Review (2008–2017)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-37, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    infrastructure; quality indicators; satisfaction levels; well-being;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oec:eduaac:2011/10-en. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deoecfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.