This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Extracting the Maximum from the EITI

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Dilan Ölcer
Abstract

For many countries rich in oil, gas and minerals, development remains an elusive goal. The rich get richer, the poor stay poor, inequality rises, economies stagnate, corruption flourishes and conflict deepens. The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) has helped to direct attention towards this sector, which has traditionally been shrouded in secrecy. It is one of the international “soft law” tools supported by the international development community to curb corruption and help resource-rich countries benefit from the revenues from their soil. However, corruption indicators show that EITI countries are not really improving their scores. Does this suggest that there should be a scaling down of expectations about what the EITI could deliver or can it be made more effective? This paper highlights deficiencies in the way the EITI works and makes recommendations that seek to increase the effectiveness of this initiative.
Pour beaucoup de pays riches en pétrole, en gaz ou en minerais, le développement semble hors d’atteinte : les riches s’enrichissent, les pauvres restent pauvres, les inégalités augmentent, l’économie stagne, la corruption s’étend et les conflits s’aggravent. L’initiative pour la transparence dans les industries extractives (ITIE) a contribué à mettre en lumière un secteur longtemps resté dans l’ombre. C’est un des instruments de soft law de la communauté internationale pour lutter contre la corruption et aider les pays riches en matières premières à bénéficier des revenus de leur sol. Néanmoins, les indicateurs de corruption montrent que les pays qui ont adopté l’ITIE n’ont pas vraiment amélioré leur performance en la matière. Faut-il alors attendre moins de l’ITIE ? Peut-elle être plus efficace ? Ce papier souligne certaines limites du fonctionnement de l’ITIE et formule des recommandations pour renforcer son efficacité.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/225520261678
File Format: text/html
File Function:
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Paper provided by OECD, Development Centre in its series OECD Development Centre Working Papers with number 276.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: 11 Mar 2009
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:oec:devaaa:276-en

Contact details of provider:
Postal: 2 rue Andre Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Email:
Web page: http://www.oecd.org/Dev
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords: corruption; EITI; natural resources; transparency; corruption; ITIE; matières premières; transparence;

Find related papers by JEL classification:
M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Social Responsibility
Q32 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Exhaustible Resources and Economic Development
Q38 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy (includes OPEC Policy)

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS was sponsored from 1997 to 2002 by the Université du Québec à Montréal.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-19.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.