The paper develops the view that the perspective on the HIPC initiative is distorted by the fact that -contrary to the Brady deal itself- it lacks all perspective on the “market value” of the debt which is written down. The appropriate “market value” is one that takes account of the risk of non-payment: arrears, rescheduling and “constrained” refinancing of various sorts. Building upon econometric evidence that relies on middle income debtors in the eighties, the paper argues that the initiative is about ten times less generous than face value accounting would suggest ...
Selon ce Document technique, l’évaluation de l'initiative PPTE (Pays Pauvres Très Endettés) est faussée par le fait que — contrairement à l'accord Brady — elle ne prend pas en compte la “valeur de marché” de la remise de dette. La “valeur de marché” exacte est celle qui intègre le risque de non-paiement : arriérés, rééchelonnements et refinancements “contraints” de différentes natures.
A partir d'une analyse économétrique des débiteurs à revenu intermédiaire des années 80, le document affirme que l'initiative est à peu près dix fois moins généreuse que ce que pourrait laisser penser sa valeur faciale comptable ...
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Craig Burnside & Domenico Fanizza, 2004.
"Hiccups for HIPCs?,"
NBER Working Papers
10903, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: