The merits of a trans-Tasman currency union have been debated in both New Zealand and Australia. It has been suggested that the New Zealand economy may not behave too differently from at least some of the Australian states, ie they have similar characteristics and they face similar shocks. We test this, under the presumption that the differences in Taylor rule implied interest rate paths for different regions over a business cycle can give us some indication about the nature of the differences in "aggregate" shocks that hit different economies. We compare the implied Taylor rule interest rates for the Australian states to the implied Taylor rule rates for New Zealand. We also compare them to the realised 90 day rates. We find that the Taylor rule implied interest rate paths in Australian regions and in New Zealand are not very different.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Reserve Bank of New Zealand Knowledge Centre).
Related research
Keywords:
Other versions of this item:
Find related papers by JEL classification: E51 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Money Supply; Credit; Money Multipliers E52 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit - - - Monetary Policy
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Alberto Alesina & Robert J. Barro, 2000.
"Currency Unions,"
NBER Working Papers
7927, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions: