This paper is concerned with the validity of historical claims that there may be a "penelty" of being a pionee. The analysis applies Aghion and Howitt's (1994) distinction between fundamental end secondary knowledge to investigate the existence of a "penalty" of being pioneer with general equilibrium model of endogenous growth.
Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Economics Group, Nuffield College, University of Oxford in its series Economics Papers with number
109.
Find related papers by JEL classification: O31 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Technological Change - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives O40 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General O49 - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Other
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)