New Modalities in Tax Decision-Making: Applying European experience to Australia
AbstractThis article criticises the current situation in judicial decision making which it says is overly dominated by ‘old fashioned’ conservative legalistic analysis. It compares this with the UK’s experience of the European challenge to its Common Law. The article urges Australian jurisprudence to learn from the European civil law. By this means, it suggests, core public policy imperatives will be permitted to shape the tax decision making agenda. This would make Australian tax judges more accountable for the application of policies against tax avoidance, and other policies behind statutory rules. The article concludes by urging Australian tax teachers to contribute to the development of a culture of accountability by judges and to take the lead in criticising the performance of judges in how they deal with policy and principles when making decisions.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by ATAX, University of New South Wales in its series Taxation with number eJournal of Tax Research Vol 2 No. 1.
Length: 30 pages
Date of creation: 05 May 2004
Date of revision:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-CDM-2004-09-12 (Collective Decision-Making)
You can help add them by filling out this form.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Research Assistant) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Research Assistant to update the entry or send us the correct address.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.