IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nip/nipewp/6-2005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Que critérios redistributivos na Lei das Finanças Locais?

Author

Abstract

This work aims the set of redistributive policies (Factor endowments, Utilitarianism or Rawlsians) that is more significant in the Portugues Law of Local Finances. For this purpose, it starts from a model, which tries to relate the partition of a budget (that is distributed by decentralised instances) with the variance of the last sharing. For testing the model with Portuguese data (since 1979), I used Johansen (1991) procedures. As a synthesis from the conclusions, it is recognized that utilitarian criteria is most significant.

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo Reis Mourão, 2005. "Que critérios redistributivos na Lei das Finanças Locais?," NIPE Working Papers 6/2005, NIPE - Universidade do Minho.
  • Handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:6/2005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www3.eeg.uminho.pt/economia/nipe/docs/2005/NIPE_WP_6_2005.PDF
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Finances; Redistribution; Decentralization;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
    • R51 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nip:nipewp:6/2005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: NIPE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nipampt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.