IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/nig/wpaper/0121.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why are Labor Quit Rates Lower among Defense Contractors?

Author

Listed:
  • Tom Hyclak
  • Todd Watkins

    (Department of Economics, National University of Ireland, Galway)

Abstract

This paper explores whether empirical evidence we find of defense contractors' lower labor-force quit rates, compared to purely commercial firms, might be associated with differences in their human resource policies and organizational practices and strategies. We take advantage of a unique original (U.S.) data set to compare labor quits, workforce skills and occupational structure between defense contracting and non-contracting small manufacturers. Findings are that, compared with otherwise similar small manufacturing establishments, defense contractors: 1) report substantially lower labor force quit rates; 2) are less likely to hire the least educated, and have more formal workforce training regimes focused more on specialized rather than generic skills; 3) are more likely practitioners across a diverse spectrum of advanced workforce and organizational practices. Then, 4) econometrically, the defense contractors' lower reported quit rates are associated with those organizational and workforce practice differences, consistent with a hypothesis of a mediated relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Tom Hyclak & Todd Watkins, 2007. "Why are Labor Quit Rates Lower among Defense Contractors?," Working Papers 121, National University of Ireland Galway, Department of Economics, revised 2007.
  • Handle: RePEc:nig:wpaper:0121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.economics.nuig.ie/resrch/paper.php?pid=128
    File Function: First version, 2007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.economics.nuig.ie/resrch/paper.php?pid=128
    File Function: Revised version, 2007
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nig:wpaper:0121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Srinivas Raghavendra (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deucgie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.