Understanding pensions: cognitive function,numerical ability and retirement saving
Abstract
As the degree to which individuals are expected to provide their own resources forretirement increases, there is a correspondingly increasing importance of individualsbeing able to understand the financial choices they face and to choose savings products,portfolios and contribution rates accordingly. In this paper we look at numerical abilityand other dimensions of cognitive function in a sample of older adults in England andexamine the extent to which these abilities are correlated with various measures ofwealth and retirement saving outcomes. The key findings are:a) Relatively large fractions of the population can be seen to have relatively low levels offinancial numeracy and these numeracy levels decline systematically with age.b) Numeracy levels are correlated with measures of retirement saving and investmentportfolios, even when we control for other cognitive ability and education.c) Numeracy is correlated with knowledge and understanding of pension arrangements,and with perceived financial security, even when we control for other cognitive ability,education and the level of overall retirement saving.The lessons of our analysis are threefold, even though at this point we have only crosssectionaldata available on which to base our analysis. Firstly, it shows yet anotherdimension in which inequalities amongst older individuals are apparent. Second, theanalysis suggests that in the short run there may be a role for targeting simple retirementplanning information at low numeracy, low wealth, low education groups. Third, itsuggests that a longer run policy goal might want to target numeracy levels moregenerally in order to reduce the fraction of the population with low basic skills. Whethersuch a policy would have knock on effects on to retirement planning arrangements,however, is a more difficult question to answer on the basis of the conditionalcorrelations we present here. On this topic in particular, there is much further work to bedone. As the degree to which individuals are expected to provide their own resources forretirement increases, there is a correspondingly increasing importance of individualsbeing able to understand the financial choices they face and to choose savings products,portfolios and contribution rates accordingly. In this paper we look at numerical abilityand other dimensions of cognitive function in a sample of older adults in England andexamine the extent to which these abilities are correlated with various measures ofwealth and retirement saving outcomes. The key findings are:a) Relatively large fractions of the population can be seen to have relatively low levels offinancial numeracy and these numeracy levels decline systematically with age.b) Numeracy levels are correlated with measures of retirement saving and investmentportfolios, even when we control for other cognitive ability and education.c) Numeracy is correlated with knowledge and understanding of pension arrangements,and with perceived financial security, even when we control for other cognitive ability,education and the level of overall retirement saving.The lessons of our analysis are threefold, even though at this point we have only crosssectionaldata available on which to base our analysis. Firstly, it shows yet anotherdimension in which inequalities amongst older individuals are apparent. Second, theanalysis suggests that in the short run there may be a role for targeting simple retirementplanning information at low numeracy, low wealth, low education groups. Third, itsuggests that a longer run policy goal might want to target numeracy levels moregenerally in order to reduce the fraction of the population with low basic skills. Whethersuch a policy would have knock on effects on to retirement planning arrangements,however, is a more difficult question to answer on the basis of the conditionalcorrelations we present here. On this topic in particular, there is much further work to bedone.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by University College London in its series Open Access publications from University College London with number http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/2690/.Length:
Date of creation: Mar 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ner:ucllon:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/2690/
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.ucl.ac.uk
Related research
Keywords:Other versions of this item:
- James Banks & Zoe Oldfield, 2007. "Understanding Pensions: Cognitive Function, Numerical Ability and Retirement Saving," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 28(2), pages 143-170, 06.
- James Banks & Zoƫ Oldfield, 2006. "Understanding pensions: cognitive function, numerical ability and retirement saving," IFS Working Papers W06/05, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ner:ucllon:http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/2690/For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Kieron Jones).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

