Going-Concern Opinions, Auditor Switching, and the Self-Fulfiiling Prophecy Effect Examined in the Regulatory Context of Belgium
AbstractNo abstract is available for this item.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Maastricht University in its series Open Access publications from Maastricht University with number urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-18435.
Date of creation: 2003
Date of revision:
Publication status: Published in Journal of accounting, auditing & finance (2003) v.18, p.231-253
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/Home.htm
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Boone, Christophe & Meuwissen, Roger & Witteloostuijn, Arjen van, 2009. "Resource-partitioning processes in the audit industry," Open Access publications from Maastricht University urn:nbn:nl:ui:27-23212, Maastricht University.
- Waymond Rodgers & Andrés Guiral & José Gonzalo, 2009. "Different Pathways that Suggest Whether Auditors’ Going Concern Opinions are Ethically Based," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 86(3), pages 347-361, May.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (J.Odekerken).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.