Nachhaltigkeitspotenzial deutscher Städte
Abstract
In diesem Beitrag untersuchen wir die nachhaltige Wohlfahrt der 100 größten kreisfreien deutschen Städte, ausgehend von einem umfassenden Wohlfahrtskonzept, das auch nicht-marktbasierende Größen enthält (Smith et al. 2001; Arrow et al. 2003; Alfsen und Greaker 2007; Dasgupta 2009; Arrow et al. 2010). Die Beschränkung auf die kreisfreien Städte ergibt sich vor allem aus dem Ziel der Studie, ausschließlich urbane Räume zu vergleichen, sowie aus dem Problem, dass es für Städte mit angegliederten Kreisen für die meisten Indikatoren keine separaten Daten nur für das eigentliche Stadtgebiet gibt. Bei der Bestimmung der nachhaltigen Wohlfahrt werden insgesamt 49 Einzelindikatoren berücksichtigt, anhand derer die für die nachhaltige Wohlfahrt relevanten Kapitalbestände in den Bereichen Umwelt-, Energie-, Sozial-, Human- und Wirtschaftskapital geschätzt werden. Darüber hinaus ziehen wir für die 50 größten Städte zusätzlich sieben Einzelindikatoren heran, um die Transparenz und das Engagement der Städte im Bereich der nachhaltigen Entwicklung zu messen. Die Ergebnisse zur nachhaltigen Wohlfahrt sowie in der Transparenz- und Engagementkategorie werden für die 50 größten Städte zusammengefasst und bilden den WirtschaftsWoche Sustainable City Indikator (WWSCI).Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Paper provided by Kiel Institute for the World Economy in its series Open Access publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy with number 50.Length:
Date of creation: 2012
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:ner:ifwkie:info:hdl:10419/59526
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.ifw-kiel.de
Related research
Keywords: Stadtökologie; Nachhaltige Entwicklung; Sozialer Indikator; Deutschland;This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2012-10-20 (All new papers)
- NEP-GER-2012-10-20 (German Papers)
References
References listed on IDEASPlease report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Alfsen, Knut H. & Greaker, Mads, 2007.
"From natural resources and environmental accounting to construction of indicators for sustainable development,"
Ecological Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 61(4), pages 600-610, March.
- Knut H. Alfsen & Mads Greaker, 2006. "From natural resources and environmental accounting to construction of indicators for sustainable development," Discussion Papers 478, Research Department of Statistics Norway.
- Hamilton, Kirk & Clemens, Michael, 1999. "Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries," World Bank Economic Review, World Bank Group, vol. 13(2), pages 333-56, May.
- Ebert, Udo & Welsch, Heinz, 2004. "Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 270-283, March.
- Asheim, Geir B, 1994. " Net National Product as an Indicator of Sustainability," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(2), pages 257-65.
- Dasgupta, Partha & M Ler, Karl-G Ran, 2000. "Net national product, wealth, and social well-being," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(01), pages 69-93, February.
- Hamilton, Kirk, 1994. "Green adjustments to GDP," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 155-168, September.
- Ekins, Paul & Simon, Sandrine & Deutsch, Lisa & Folke, Carl & De Groot, Rudolf, 2003. "A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2-3), pages 165-185, March.
- Partha Dasgupta, 2009. "The Welfare Economic Theory of Green National Accounts," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 42(1), pages 3-38, January.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ner:ifwkie:info:hdl:10419/59526For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Contact person).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

