Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

Costs, biases and betting markets: new evidence

Contents:

Author Info

  • Michael A. Smith
  • David Paton
  • Leighton Vaughan-Williams

Abstract

In recent years, person-to-person wagering on Internet ‘betting exchanges’ (sometimes known as ‘matched betting’) has become an increasingly important medium for betting on horse racing, sports and special events. Established gambling operators have argued that betting exchanges should not be allowed on the grounds that they represent unfair competition. In this paper, we argue that, in fact, betting exchanges have brought about reductions in traditional market biases and significant efficiency gains by lowering transaction costs for consumers. As such, the growth of exchange betting should be viewed as a welcome and innovatory phenomenon whereby allocative efficiency in the gambling market is improved. We test this hypothesis using data on UK horse racing from betting exchanges and from traditional betting media. We find a monotonic negative relationship between transaction costs and market efficiency. Further, in contrast to traditional betting media, we find that betting exchanges exhibit both weak and strong form market efficiency.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.ntu.ac.uk/research/document_uploads/31290.pdf
File Function: First version, 2004
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham Business School, Economics Division in its series Working Papers with number 2004/5.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Sep 2004
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:nbs:wpaper:2004/5

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.ntu.ac.uk/nbs

Related research

Keywords: matched betting; betting exchanges; market efficiency; favourite-longshot bias.;

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
  1. Maschke, Mario & Schmidt, Ulrich, 2010. "Das Wettmonopol in Deutschland: Status Quo und Reformansätze," Kiel Policy Brief 18, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).

Lists

This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
  1. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 February 21 in Wikipedia (English)
  2. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matched betting in Wikipedia (English)

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbs:wpaper:2004/5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Simeon Coleman).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.