Differences in the Uses and Effects of Antidumping Law Across Import Sources
AbstractThis paper studies the differences in the uses and effects of U.S. antidumping law on imports and domestic output across the major regions exporting to the United States. We attempt to characterize the implications of the use of antidumping law for U.S. imports and domestic output, and to distinguish between 'outcome filers'(firms for which the prospect of an antidumping duty is important), 'process filers'(firms that desire to secure the trade-restricting effects of the investigation process itself) Previously we allowed for the coexistence of outcome- and process-filing industries and found evidence consistent with the process filers' presence in some industries However, we restricted filing strategy to be the same for all imports in that industry regardless of their country of origin. Here we abstract from cross- industry heterogeneity in antidumping filing strategies and explore the heterogeneity of filing strategies against different import-source countries, allowing for domestic firms that may pursue independent filing strategies. We argue that the most likely target countries for process filers are those whose export production is primarily destined for the U.S. and accounts for a relatively large and stable U.S. market share. These characteristics point to Canada and Mexico as countries against which process filing by U.S. firms is likely. We find evidence in the filing behavior and in the nature of the trade impacts suggesting that Mexico and Canada are indeed the most likely targets of antidumping petitions filed by process filers in the United States.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 4846.
Date of creation: Sep 1994
Date of revision:
Publication status: published as The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, Anne O. Krueger, ed.,pp. 385-415, (University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
- Robert W. Staiger & Frank A. Wolak, 1996. "Differences in the Uses and Effects of Antidumping Law across Import Sources," NBER Chapters, in: The Political Economy of American Trade Policy, pages 385-422 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Robert Staiger & Frank Wolak, 1994. "Differences in The Uses and Effects of Antidumping Law Across Import Sources," International Trade, EconWPA 9411001, EconWPA.
- F33 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Hartigan, James C & Kamma, Sreenivas & Perry, Philip R, 1989. "The Injury Determination Category and the Value of Relief from Dumping," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 183-86, February.
- John M. Abowd, 1990. "The NBER Immigration, Trade, and Labor Markets Data Files," NBER Working Papers 3351, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Basyah, Mohammad & Hartigan, James C., 2007. "Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the persistence of antidumping relief," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 383-399.
- Mustapha Sadni Jallab & Monnet BenoÃ®t Patrick Gbakou & RenÃ© Sandretto, 2008.
"L'influence des facteurs macroÃ©conomiques sur les ouvertures d'enquÃªtes antidumping : le cas de l'Union EuropÃ©enne et des Ã‰tats-Unis,"
Revue d'Ã©conomie politique, Dalloz,
Dalloz, vol. 0(4), pages 573-600.
- Mustapha Sadni Jallab & Monnet Gbakou & RenÃ© Sandretto, 2008. "L'influence des facteurs macroÃ©conomiques sur les ouvertures d'enquÃªtes antidumping : Le cas de l'Union europÃ©enne et des Ã‰tats-Unis," Post-Print halshs-00371769, HAL.
- Nelson, Douglas, 2006. "The political economy of antidumping: A survey," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 554-590, September.
- Robin, Donald P. & Charles Sawyer, W., 1998. "The ethics of antidumping petitions," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 315-328, October.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.