Overruling and the Instability of Law
AbstractWe investigate the evolution of common law under overruling, a system of precedent change in which appellate courts replace existing legal rules with new ones. We use a legal realist model, in which judges change the law to reflect their own preferences or attitudes, but changing the law is costly to them. The model's predictions are consistent with the empirical evidence on the overruling behavior of the U.S. Supreme Court and appellate courts. We find that overruling leads to unstable legal rules that rarely converge to efficiency. The selection of disputes for litigation does not change this conclusion. Our findings provide a rationale for the value of precedent, as well as for the general preference of appellate courts for distinguishing rather than overruling as a law-making strategy.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 12913.
Date of creation: Feb 2007
Date of revision:
Publication status: published as Gennaioli, Nicola & Shleifer, Andrei, 2007. "Overruling and the instability of law," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 309-328, June.
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
- K13 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - Tort Law and Product Liability; Forensic Economics
- K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
- NEP-ALL-2007-02-24 (All new papers)
- NEP-LAW-2007-02-24 (Law & Economics)
- NEP-POL-2007-02-24 (Positive Political Economics)
- NEP-UPT-2007-02-24 (Utility Models & Prospect Theory)
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Rafael LaPorta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silane & Cristian Pop-Eleches & Andrei Shleifer, 2003.
"Judicial Checks and Balances,"
NBER Working Papers
9775, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes & Cristian Pop-Eleches & Andrei Shleifer, 2004. "Judicial Checks and Balances," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(2), pages 445-470, April.
- Robert Cooter & Lewis Kornhauser & David Lane, 1979. "Liability Rules, Limited Information, and the Role of Precedent," Bell Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, The RAND Corporation, vol. 10(1), pages 366-373, Spring.
- Spiller, Pablo T & Tiller, Emerson H, 1997. "Decision Costs and the Strategic Design of Administrative Process and Judicial Review," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 26(2), pages 347-70, June.
- Schwartz, Edward P, 1992. "Policy, Precedent, and Power: A Positive Theory of Supreme Court Decision-Making," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 219-52, April.
- Nicola Gennaioli & Andrei Shleifer, 2007.
"The Evolution of Common Law,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press,
University of Chicago Press, vol. 115, pages 43-68.
- Kornhauser, Lewis A, 1992. "Modeling Collegial Courts. II. Legal Doctrine," Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 441-70, October.
- Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2012.
"Sequential R&D and Blocking Patents in the Dynamics of Growth,"
2012_02, Durham University Business School.
- Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2014. "Sequential R&D and blocking patents in the dynamics of growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 183-219, June.
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2013. "Sequential R&D and Blocking Patents in the Dynamics of Growth," Economics Working Paper Series 1305, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
- Carsten Hefeker & Michael Neugart, 2009.
"Labor Market Regulation and the Legal System,"
MAGKS Papers on Economics, Philipps-UniversitÃ¤t Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung)
200915, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
- Hefeker, Carsten & Neugart, Michael, 2010. "Labor market regulation and the legal system," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 218-225, September.
- Anderlini, Luca & Felli, Leonardo & Riboni, Alessandro, 2011.
"Why Stare Decisis?,"
CEPR Discussion Papers, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers
8266, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Anderlini, Luca & Felli, Leonardo & Riboni, Alessandro, 2010. "Why Stare Decisis ?," Economics Papers from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University 123456789/7720, Paris Dauphine University.
- Luca Anderlini & Leonardo Felli & Alessandro Riboni, 2010. "Why Stare Decisis?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 661465000000000068, David K. Levine.
- Niblett, Anthony, 2013. "Tracking inconsistent judicial behavior," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 9-20.
- Guido Cozzi & Silvia Galli, 2009.
"Upstream Innovation Protection: Common Law Evolution and the Dynamics of Wage Inequality,"
Working Papers, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow
2009_20, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
- Cozzi, Guido & Galli, Silvia, 2011. "Upstream innovation protection: common law evolution and the dynamics of wage inequality," MPRA Paper 31902, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Guerriero, C., 2009. "Democracy, Judicial Attitudes and Heterogeneity: The Civil Versus Common Law Tradition," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge 0917, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
- Massenot, Baptiste, 2011. "Financial development in adversarial and inquisitorial legal systems," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 602-608.
- Thomas J. Miceli, 2008.
"Legal Change and the Social Value of Lawsuits,"
Working papers, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics
2008-34, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
- Miceli, Thomas J., 2010. "Legal change and the social value of lawsuits," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 203-208, September.
- Matthew C. Stephenson, 2009. "Legal Realism for Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 23(2), pages 191-211, Spring.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.