Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Overconfidence, Subjective Perception and Pricing Behavior

Contents:

Author Info

  • Pierpaolo Benigno
  • Anastasios Karantounias

Abstract

We study the implications of a particular form of irrationality on the pricing behavior of firms in a monopolistic-competitive market with incomplete information. We assume that firms are overconfident, meaning that they over-estimate their abilities to understand the correct model of the economy. However, we allow firms to obtain information by paying a fixed cost. We find two important implications: i) overconfident firms are less inclined to acquire information; ii) prices might exhibit excess volatility driven by non-fundamental disturbances. We use our model to match some facts related to recent empirical evidence on disaggregated price data for the US economy.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w11922.pdf
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc in its series NBER Working Papers with number 11922.

as in new window
Length:
Date of creation: Jan 2006
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11922

Note: ME
Contact details of provider:
Postal: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A.
Phone: 617-868-3900
Email:
Web page: http://www.nber.org
More information through EDIRC

Related research

Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
as in new window
  1. Jose A. Scheinkman & Wei Xiong, 2003. "Overconfidence and Speculative Bubbles," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(6), pages 1183-1219, December.
  2. Mark Gertler & John Leahy, 2006. "A Phillips curve with an Ss foundation," Working Papers, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia 06-8, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
  3. Ball, Laurence & Romer, David, 1991. "Sticky Prices as Coordination Failure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 81(3), pages 539-52, June.
  4. N. Gregory Mankiw & Ricardo Reis, 2001. "Sticky Information Versus Sticky Prices: A Proposal to Replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research 1922, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
  5. Mirko Wiederholt & Bartosz Mackowiak, 2005. "Optimal Sticky Prices under Rational Inattention," 2005 Meeting Papers, Society for Economic Dynamics 369, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  6. Lucas, Robert Jr., 1972. "Expectations and the neutrality of money," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 103-124, April.
  7. Ricardo Reis, 2006. "Inattentive Producers," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, Oxford University Press, vol. 73(3), pages 793-821.
  8. V. V. Chari & Patrick J. Kehoe & Ellen R. McGrattan, 2000. "Sticky Price Models of the Business Cycle: Can the Contract Multiplier Solve the Persistence Problem?," Econometrica, Econometric Society, Econometric Society, vol. 68(5), pages 1151-1180, September.
  9. Robert Lucas & Mike Golosov, 2004. "Menu Costs and Phillips Curves," 2004 Meeting Papers, Society for Economic Dynamics 144, Society for Economic Dynamics.
  10. Blanchard, Olivier Jean & Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, 1987. "Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 77(4), pages 647-66, September.
  11. Harald Uhlig, 2010. "A Law of Large Numbers for Large Economies," Levine's Working Paper Archive, David K. Levine 2070, David K. Levine.
  12. Laurence M. Ball & David Romer, 1987. "Are Prices Too Sticky?," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 2171, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  13. Daniel, Kent & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2002. "Investor psychology in capital markets: evidence and policy implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 139-209, January.
  14. Peter J. Klenow & Oleksiy Kryvtsov, 2007. "State-Dependent or Time-Dependent Pricing: Does It Matter for Recent U.S. Inflation?," Discussion Papers, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research 07-007, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
  15. Thomas Oberlechner & Carol Osler, 2009. "Overconfidence in Currency Markets," Working Papers, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Businesss School 02, Brandeis University, Department of Economics and International Businesss School.
  16. Mark Bils & Peter J. Klenow, 2004. "Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago Press, vol. 112(5), pages 947-985, October.
  17. Michael Woodford, 2001. "Imperfect Common Knowledge and the Effects of Monetary Policy," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc 8673, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  18. Olivier Compte & Andrew Postlewaite, 2001. "Confidence-Enhanced Performance," PIER Working Paper Archive, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania 04-023, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania, revised 01 May 2003.
  19. Jeffery D. Amato & Hyun Song Shin, 2004. "Public and Private Information in Monetary Policy Models," DNB Staff Reports (discontinued), Netherlands Central Bank 117, Netherlands Central Bank.
  20. Roll, Richard, 1984. "Orange Juice and Weather," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pages 861-80, December.
  21. Sims, Christopher A., 2003. "Implications of rational inattention," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 665-690, April.
  22. Phelps, Edmund S, 1969. "The New Microeconomics in Inflation and Employment Theory," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 147-60, May.
  23. Kent D. Daniel, 2001. "Overconfidence, Arbitrage, and Equilibrium Asset Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, American Finance Association, vol. 56(3), pages 921-965, 06.
Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11922. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ().

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.