Is the Outcome of the Federal Budget Process Unbaised and Efficient? A NonParametric Assessment

This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data

Is the Outcome of the Federal Budget Process Unbaised and Efficient? A NonParametric Assessment

Author Info

Campbell, B.
Ghysels, E.

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Eric Ghysels

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Paper provided by Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ in its series Cahiers de recherche with number 9217.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length: 32 pages
Date of creation: 1992
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:mtl:montec:9217

Contact details of provider:
Postal: C.P. 6128, Succ. centre-ville, Montr�al (PQ) H3C 3J7
Phone: (514) 343-6557
Fax: (514) 343-5831
Email:
Web page: http://www.cireq.umontreal.ca
More information through EDIRC

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Sharon BREWER).

Related research
Keywords: forecasts ; economic models ; budget;

Other versions of this item:

Paper
- Campbell, B. & Ghysels, E., 1992. "Is the Outcome of the Federal Budget Process Unbaised and Efficient? a NonParametric Assessment," Cahiers de recherche 9217, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

N.R. Swanson & D.J.C. van Dijk, 2001. "Are statistical reporting agencies getting it right? Data rationality and business cycle asymmetry," Econometric Institute Report 230, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
Other versions:
- Swanson, N.R. & Dijk, D.J.C. van, 2001. "Are statistical reporting agencies getting it right? Data rationality and business cycle asymmetry," Econometric Institute Report EI 2001-28 Revision_Date:, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute. [Downloadable!]
- Swanson, Norman R. & van Dijk, Dick, 2006. "Are Statistical Reporting Agencies Getting It Right? Data Rationality and Business Cycle Asymmetry," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 24, pages 24-42, January. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Francis X. Diebold & Robert S. Mariano, 1994. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," NBER Technical Working Papers 0169, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
- Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 2002. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 20(1), pages 134-44, January.
- Diebold, Francis X & Mariano, Roberto S, 1995. "Comparing Predictive Accuracy," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 13(3), pages 253-63, July.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Did you know? A few items listed on IDEAS are over 2000 years old!

This page was last updated on 2009-11-25.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.