We characterize a class of collective choice rules such that collective preference relations are consistent. Consistency is a weakening of transitivity and a strengthening of acyclicity requiring that there be no cycles with at least one strict preference. The properties used in our characterization are unrestricted domain, strong Pareto, anonymity and neutrality. If there are at most as many individuals as there are alternatives, the axioms provide an alternative characterization of the Pareto rule. If there are more individuals than alternatives, however, further rules become available.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques in its series Cahiers de recherche with number
2006-12.
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Walter Bossert & Yves Sprumont & Kotaro Suzumura, 2005.
"Consistent Rationalizability,"
Economica,
London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 72(286), pages 185-200, 05.
[Downloadable!] (restricted)
Other versions:
Bossert, W. & Sprumont, Y. & Suzumura, K., 2002.
"Consistent Rationalizability,"
Cahiers de recherche
12-2002, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
[Downloadable!]
BOSSERT, Walter & SPRUMONT, Yves & SUZUMURA, Kotaro, 2002.
"Consistent Rationalizability,"
Cahiers de recherche
2002-12, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
[Downloadable!]