This paper examines the experience of Mozambique and Zambia, whose contrasting policy approaches and performance appear to challenge concerns that liberalization inevitably leads to the collapse of input systems for crops like cotton. First these countries are placed in context by providing a brief empirical overview of the performance of cotton sectors in seven SSA countries of Southern, Eastern, and West Africa. The authors then focus on Mozambique and Zambia, reviewing their differing initial conditions at the outset of reform, the divergent policies that each has put in place, and their relative performance. It conclude that a simple policy choice between liberalization or regulated monopoly is not sufficient for either cotton sector to achieve desired performance in the absence of rural input and credit markets, and identify the elements of joint public/private strategies necessary to improve performance in each country.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Find related papers by JEL classification: Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)