Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Should You Use Beta-MAX for Medicaid Research?


Author Info

  • Rosemary Borck
  • Rosalie Malsberger
  • Kristin Andrews
Registered author(s):


    In 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services created the Beta-MAX data system to improve the timeliness of Medicaid Analytic Extract (MAX) data while retaining many of the benefits of MAX data for research. This report compares Beta-MAX data with MAX data for 2009 for 32 states with available data. The report updates the Beta-MAX pilot study released in 2010, which assessed the reliability of Beta-MAX data based on data for six states. Overall Beta-MAX data were generally consistent with MAX data on estimates of key enrollee populations, expenditures, and service utilization. Some small differences between the two files resulted from Beta-MAX data that included only four quarters of other (OT) claims files.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Joanne Pfleiderer) or (Joanne Lustig)
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Mathematica Policy Research in its series Mathematica Policy Research Reports with number 7549.

    as in new window
    Length: 77
    Date of creation: 31 Aug 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7549

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications
    Fax: (609) 799-0005
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Medicaid; Beta-MAX; Health;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joanne Pfleiderer) or (Joanne Lustig).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.