Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Type of Health Insurance and the Substance Abuse Treatment Gap


Author Info

  • Ellen Englert Bouchery
  • Henrick J. Harwood
  • Joan Dilonardo
  • Rita Vandivort-Warren
Registered author(s):


    A study recently published concluded that populations with different types of public health insurance have rates of receiving treatment for a substance use disorder that range from two to four times greater than the privately insured. The study was funded by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), with authors from SAMHSA, Mathematica, and the National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors. The study also found that those with private health insurance plans who need substance abuse treatment have the lowest rates of receiving any treatment services or specialty treatment services (6.9% and 3.9%, respectively).

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 503 Service Unavailable. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Joanne Pfleiderer) or (Joanne Lustig)
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Mathematica Policy Research in its series Mathematica Policy Research Reports with number 7392.

    as in new window
    Length: 12
    Date of creation: 30 Apr 2012
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7392

    Contact details of provider:
    Postal: Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Attn: Communications
    Fax: (609) 799-0005
    Web page:
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Substance Abuse Treatment; Access to Care; Insurance Coverage; Health;

    Find related papers by JEL classification:

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.



    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mpr:mprres:7392. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Joanne Pfleiderer) or (Joanne Lustig).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.