Does an increase in the doctor supply reduce medical fees? An econometric analysis of medical fees across Australia
AbstractOne of the clearest predictions of economic theory is that an autonomous increase in supply will depress the price which equilibriates supply and demand. However, US evidence with respect to medical fees has been perverse: higher fees have been observed in areas with more doctors even after standardising for other relevant variables. This has resulted in two broad responses. Some have invoked the (once) controversial theory of supplier-induced demand to account for the anomaly. Others have suggested ingenious ways of explaining the results within the orthodox framework in which supply and demand are independent. There has been almost no analysis of price formulation in the Australian medical market. It has been generally assumed that the usual supply demand relationships apply in the Australian context, and that perversity in the US is attributable to US specific market characteristics. The present article examines the setting of GP fees in the Australian market using 1995 cross-section data from statistical sub-divisions. The implications of the results for workforce planning and for the analysis of consumer benefits are discussed.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoPaper provided by Monash University, Centre for Health Economics in its series Centre for Health Economics Working Papers with number 145/04.
Length: 24 pages
Date of creation: Apr 2004
Date of revision:
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Building 75, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Web page: http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/
More information through EDIRC
Other versions of this item:
- Jeffrey Richardson & Stuart Peacock & Duncan Mortimer, 2006. "Does an increase in the doctor supply reduce medical fees? An econometric analysis of medical fees across Australia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 253-266.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Reinhardt, Uwe E., 1985. "The theory of physician-induced demand reflections after a decade," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 187-193, June.
- Andrew M. Jones, 2012.
The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics,
- Horowitz, Joel L., 1994. "Bootstrap-based critical values for the information matrix test," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 395-411, April.
- Hugh Gravelle & Anthony Scott & Peter Sivey & Jongsay Yong, 2013.
"Competition, Prices and Quality in the Market for Physician Consultations,"
Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series
wp2013n23, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.
- Hugh Gravelle & Anthony Scott & Peter Sivey & Jongsay Yong, 2013. "Competition, prices, and quality in the market for physician consultations," Working Papers 089cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
- Jackie Cumming & Steven Stillman & Michelle Poland, 2009. "Who Pays What for Primary Health Care? Patterns and Determinants of the Fees Paid by Patients in a Mixed Public-Private Financing Model," Working Papers 09_01, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
- Stuart Peacock & Jeffrey Richardson, 2007. "Supplier-induced demand: re-examining identification and misspecification in cross-sectional analysis," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 267-277, September.
- Rita Santos & Hugh Gravelle & Carol Propper, . "Does quality affect patients’ choice of doctor? Evidence from the UK Abstract: Provider competition is a currently popular healthcare reform model. A necessary condition for greater competition to i," The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 13/306, Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK.
- Rita Santos & Hugh Gravelle & Carol Propper, 2013. "Does quality affect patientsâ€™ choice of doctor? Evidence from the UK," Working Papers 088cherp, Centre for Health Economics, University of York.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Teresa Cheong).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.