IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mcm/qseprr/333.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is There Convergence in Provincial Spending Priorities?

Author

Listed:
  • Michael M. Atkinson
  • Gerald Bierling

Abstract

This article examines the question of whether the provinces are becoming increasingly similar in their total spending and in the level of spending devoted to particular functional areas. Using various measures of spending, we begin by briefly tracing the pattern of provincial spending between 1971 and 1994. We then show, using Dispersion Indexes, that in some areas there has been a persistent movement toward similar levels of spending and similar spending priorities, while in other areas a divergent or indeterminate pattern has been established. Of some importance is the fact that particular provinces are outliers or influential cases and as such have the capacity to influence significantly the degree of convergence observed. In addition, the twenty-four year period is not one unbroken pattern. In some cases the provinces reverse their initial convergent direction and become increasingly different from one another. We suggest some reasons for these patterns, including the role of federal- provincial fiscal relations and the impact of changing economic conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael M. Atkinson & Gerald Bierling, 1997. "Is There Convergence in Provincial Spending Priorities?," Quantitative Studies in Economics and Population Research Reports 333, McMaster University.
  • Handle: RePEc:mcm:qseprr:333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    convergence; provincial spending priorities; dispersion indexes;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcm:qseprr:333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/demcmca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.