| Author Info |
Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):
| Abstract |
We compare the economic efficiency of a publicly-owned utility directly controlled by the government with a publicly-owned utility regulated by a public utility commission (PUC). Regulation by a PUC is modelled as a Nash equilibrium of a game between two principals, the government and the PUC, each of them having control over a subset of decision variables determining the utility performance. A utility manager, who has private information over a productivity parameter, is the agent. Comparisons of both regulatory regimes are made with respect to output, choice of inputs, manager's information rent and firm's profit. Reasons for which the government should prefer one regulatory regime over the other are discussed. The recent regulatory reform of electricity markets in the province of Quebec (Canada) provides an illustration of the model.
| Download Info |
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
| Publisher Info |
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF
Contact details of provider:
Postal: Pavillon J.A. De S�ve, Qu�bec, Qu�bec, G1K 7P4
Phone: (418) 656-5122
Fax: (418) 656-2707
Email:
Web page: http://www.ecn.ulaval.ca
More information through EDIRC
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Johanne Perron).
| Related research |
Other versions of this item:
This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:
| Statistics |
Did you know? You too can volunteer for RePEc, for example by editing a NEP report.
This page was last updated on 2009-12-15.