Advanced Search

A Test of the Rational Expectations Hypothesis using data from a Natural Experiment

Contents:

Author Info

  • Anna Conte

    () (Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli)

  • Peter G. Moffatt

    () (School of Economics, University of East Anglia)

  • Fabrizio Botti

    () (Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli)

  • Daniela Di Cagno

    () (Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli)

  • Carlo D'Ippoliti

    () (Department of Economic and Business Sciences, LUISS Guido Carli)

Abstract

Data on contestantsÕ choices in Italian Game Show Affari Tuoi are analysed in a way that separates the effect of risk attitude from that of beliefs concerning the amount of money that will be offered to contestants in future rounds. The importance of belief-formation is confirmed by the estimation of a mixture model which establishes that the vast majority of contestants are forward-looking as opposed to myopic. The most important issue addressed in the paper is what belief function is actually being used by contestants. This function is estimated in an unconstrained way as a component of the choice model, which is estimated using maximum simulated likelihood. Separate identification of the belief function and preferences is possible by virtue of the fact that at a certain stage of the game, beliefs are not relevant, and risk attitude is the sole determinant of choice. The rational expectations hypothesis is tested by comparing the estimated belief function with the ÒtrueÓ offer function which is estimated using data on offers actually made to contestants. We find that there is a significant difference between these two functions, and hence we reject the rational expectations hypothesis. However, when a simpler Òrule-of-thumbÓ structure is assumed for the belief function, we find a correspondence to the function obtained from data on actual offers. Our overall conclusion is that contestants are rational to the extent that they make use of all available relevant information, but are not fully rational because they are not processing the information in an optimal way. The importance of allowing the choice data to convey the belief function without prejudice is emphasised.

Download Info

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
File URL: http://www.luiss.it/RePEc/pdf/q146.pdf
Our checks indicate that this address may not be valid because: 404 Not Found. If this is indeed the case, please notify (Daniela Di Cagno)
Download Restriction: no

Bibliographic Info

Paper provided by Dipartimento di Economia e Finanza, LUISS Guido Carli in its series Quaderni DEF with number 146.

Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Length:
Date of creation: Aug 2007
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:lui:wpaper:146

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Viale Romania 32 - 00197 Roma
Phone: 06 85225.550
Fax: 06 85225.973
Email:
Web page: http://ricerca.economiaefinanza.luiss.it/
More information through EDIRC

For corrections or technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Daniela Di Cagno).

Related research

Keywords: beliefs; discrete choice models; simulated likelihood; natural experiments; rational expectations; risky choices;

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lui:wpaper:146

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Daniela Di Cagno).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.