The domestic repercussions of trade liberalization have come under intense scrutiny in recent years. Trade liberalization and other aspects of globalization have been blamed for income inequality in the United States and unemployment in Europe. A key concern has been trade with low-wage developing countries. Although economists have studied the issue, no clear-cut answers have emerged. This paper examines some reasons for this ambiguity. Endogeneity and simultaneity can create major problems, causing trade to be blamed for developments that should properly be attributed to other factors. But even taken on its own, trade has ambiguous effects. It is only in the simplest Heckscher-Ohlin set-up that trade liberalization has the unequivocal outcome predicted by its critics.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Paper provided by Lowe Institute of Political Economy in its series Working Papers with number
0201.
Length: 13 pages Date of creation: 2002 Date of revision: Publication status: Published in Oekonomie in Theorie und Praxis (Springer 2002), pages 15-29. Handle: RePEc:loi:wpaper:0201
Find related papers by JEL classification: F11 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Neoclassical Models of Trade F21 - International Economics - - International Factor Movements and International Business - - - International Investment; Long-Term Capital Movements