IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lee/wpaper/1405.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The economic burden of cancer survivorship in the UK: a patient-level analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Marti

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Peter Hall

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Patrick Hamilton

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Claire Hulme

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Helen Jones

    (Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds)

  • Galina Velikova

    (Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds)

  • Laura Ashley

    (School of Social, Psychological and Communication Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Metropolitan University)

  • Penny Wright

    (Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, Bexley Wing, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds)

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the economic burden of cancer survivorship for disease-free breast, colorectal and prostate cancer patients in the UK, one year post-diagnosis. Methods: Patient-level data were collected over a three months period 12-15 months post diagnosis to estimate the monthly societal costs incurred by disease-free cancer survivors. Self-reported resource utilisation data were obtained via the electronic Patient-reported Outcomes from Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system and included community-based health and social care, medications, travel costs and carers’ time. Hospital costs were retrieved through data linkage with the patient-level information and costing systems (PLICS). Patients also provided information on their pre-diagnostic and current employment status. Multivariate regression analysis was used to examine cost predictors. Results: Overall 296 patients were included in the analysis, including 135 breast cancer, 83 colorectal cancer and 78 prostate cancer patients. The average monthly societal cost was £260 (95% CI: £198-£322) and was incurred by 92% of patients. These were divided into costs to the NHS (mean: £177, 95% CI: £131-£224), patients’ out-of-pocket (OOP) costs (mean: £25, 95% CI: £9-£42) and costs of informal care (mean: £70, 95% CI: £38-£102).The distribution of societal costs was skewed with a small number of patients incurring very high monthly costs. Of 144 patients working pre-diagnosis, 110 (76.4%) were still working 15 months post-diagnosis. Multivariate analyses showed higher NHS costs for breast cancer patients. Significant predictors of OOP costs included age and socioeconomic status. Conclusions: In the UK, the population of cancer survivors is increasing and the full economic consequences of the disease are still poorly understood. This study found that the economic burden of cancer survivorship is unevenly distributed in the population and that disease-free cancer survivors still required substantial support from family and friends over 1 year post-diagnosis. In addition, this study illustrates the feasibility of using an innovative online data collection platform to routinely collect patient-reported resource utilisation information.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Marti & Peter Hall & Patrick Hamilton & Claire Hulme & Helen Jones & Galina Velikova & Laura Ashley & Penny Wright, 2014. "The economic burden of cancer survivorship in the UK: a patient-level analysis," Working Papers 1405, Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds.
  • Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/950/auhe_wp14_05
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    cancer survivorship; societal cost; resource use; out-of-pocket expenses; informal care; patient-reported outcomes; online data collection;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Judy Wright (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/heleeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.