Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login

An economic model of cost effectiveness of peer interventions to prevent HIV infections in prison

Contents:

Author Info

  • Roberta Longo

    ()
    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Claire Hulme

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Armando Vargas-Palacios

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Karen Vinall-Collier

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Jane South

    (Leeds Metropolitan University)

  • Anne Marie Bagnall

    (Leeds Metropolitan University)

  • James Woodall

    (Leeds Metropolitan University)

  • Gary Raine

    (Leeds Metropolitan University)

  • Karina Kinsella

    (Leeds Metropolitan University)

Registered author(s):

    Abstract

    Aim: To assess the cost-effectiveness of peer-based sexual behaviour education interventions in prison settings to prevent primary and secondary HIV infections. Methods: Based on the results of a systematic review of peer-based interventions in prison settings, we developed a Bernoulli model to estimate the number of HIV infections averted, consequent loss of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) avoided and associated savings in health care costs over a lifetime respectively for a peer-led and a professionally-led education intervention. Results: The economic model showed that peer-led and professionally-led educational interventions prevent future HIV infections among offenders in prison settings, thus saving a significant amount of health care costs compared to a ‘do nothing’ scenario. In addition the peer-led intervention is dominant when compared to the professionally-led intervention (it is more effective and less costly). Whilst the model is surrounded by considerable uncertainty, the dominance scenario is confirmed in the one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis conducted. Conclusions: This study adds to previous evidence on the effectiveness of peer based educational interventions in preventing HIV in prison by showing that these are not only more effective but also cost less than the professionally-led alternative.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/837/auhe_wp14_02
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no

    Bibliographic Info

    Paper provided by Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds in its series Working Papers with number 1402.

    as in new window
    Length: 23 pages
    Date of creation: 2014
    Date of revision:
    Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1402

    Contact details of provider:
    Phone: Charles Thackrah Building, 101 Clarendon Road, LEEDS LS9 2LJ
    Fax: +44 (0) 113 343 3470
    Email:
    Web page: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/auhe
    More information through EDIRC

    Related research

    Keywords: Cost-effectiveness analysis; HIV; prevention in prison; sexual behaviour; peer education;

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    References

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    Citations

    Lists

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Veale).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.